Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2021.12
DC FieldValue
dc.titleApproximating the Center Ranking Under Ulam
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, D
dc.contributor.authorGajjar, K
dc.contributor.authorJha, AV
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-14T07:38:55Z
dc.date.available2023-06-14T07:38:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifier.citationChakraborty, D, Gajjar, K, Jha, AV (2021-12-01). Approximating the Center Ranking Under Ulam. 41st IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2021) 213 : 12:1-12:21. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2021.12
dc.identifier.isbn9783959772150
dc.identifier.issn1868-8969
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241981
dc.description.abstractWe study the problem of approximating a center under the Ulam metric. The Ulam metric, defined over a set of permutations over [n], is the minimum number of move operations (deletion plus insertion) to transform one permutation into another. The Ulam metric is a simpler variant of the general edit distance metric. It provides a measure of dissimilarity over a set of rankings/permutations. In the center problem, given a set of permutations, we are asked to find a permutation (not necessarily from the input set) that minimizes the maximum distance to the input permutations. This problem is also referred to as maximum rank aggregation under Ulam. So far, we only know of a folklore 2-approximation algorithm for this NP-hard problem. Even for constantly many permutations, we do not know anything better than an exhaustive search over all n! permutations. In this paper, we achieve a (32 - 31m)-approximation of the Ulam center in time nO(m2 ln m), for m input permutations over [n]. We therefore get a polynomial time bound while achieving better than a 3/2-approximation for constantly many permutations. This problem is of special interest even for constantly many permutations because under certain dissimilarity measures over rankings, even for four permutations, the problem is NP-hard. In proving our result, we establish a surprising connection between the approximate Ulam center problem and the closest string with wildcards problem (the center problem over the Hamming metric, allowing wildcards). We further study the closest string with wildcards problem and show that there cannot exist any (2 - ϵ)-approximation algorithm (for any ϵ > 0) for it unless P = NP. This inapproximability result is in sharp contrast with the same problem without wildcards, where we know of a PTAS.
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.date.updated2023-06-14T05:45:25Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
dc.description.doi10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2021.12
dc.description.sourcetitle41st IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2021)
dc.description.volume213
dc.description.page12:1-12:21
dc.description.placeGermany
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
LIPIcs-FSTTCS-2021-12.pdfPublished version971.49 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.