Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.010
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: Finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible
dc.contributor.authorWong, Raymond CW
dc.contributor.authorTideman, Henk
dc.contributor.authorMerkx, Matthias AW
dc.contributor.authorJansen, John
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Suk Ming
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T08:24:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-26T08:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-01
dc.identifier.citationWong, Raymond CW, Tideman, Henk, Merkx, Matthias AW, Jansen, John, Goh, Suk Ming (2012-12-01). The modular endoprosthesis for mandibular body replacement. Part 2: Finite element analysis of endoprosthesis reconstruction of the mandible. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 40 (8) : E487-E497. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.010
dc.identifier.issn1010-5182
dc.identifier.issn1878-4119
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/241074
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Problems with loosening of the modules for the modular endoprosthesis were encountered in animal studies for mandibular body replacement. We performed a finite element analysis to look at the stress distribution and areas of stress concentration in a human sized mandible. Variations were made to the stem and defect length to look at how the forces changed. The hypothesis was: (1) reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis did not lead to areas of stress concentration beyond the material strength of cortical bone and titanium alloy; (2) changes in dimensions of the endoprosthesis did not cause a corresponding linear increase to the stresses. Materials and methods: The endoprosthesis was modelled to create a male, female part with stems and a connection screw (Case I). The stem length was halved (Case II) and defect length doubled (Case III). Geometric data of a human sized mandible were obtained, a continuity defect created digitally at the right molar area and the models combined. Boundary conditions were set and the model loaded to get a bite force of 300 N at the incisor region. An intact mandible was used as a control. Results: The right side of the reconstructed mandible became less rigid and flexed more. The highest stresses were within the endoprosthesis at two areas of stress concentration: (1) shear stress at the superior surface of the stems close to the junction of the stem and the module body; (2) compressive stresses at the bottom bevel of the dove-tailed connection. The stress distribution for Case I and II did not differ much except for the magnitude which was slightly higher for Case II. There was a tendency for outward bending at the module connection for Case III which potentially might cause loosening of the module connection. Displacements of the mandible were less than 1 mm throughout. Conclusion: The endoprosthesis with its present dimensions would be expected to perform adequately at a bite force of 300 N. An increase in defect length caused a tendency for bending at the stem and the module connection. With a decrease in stem length, there were little differences except a slight increase in magnitude. © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo- Facial Surgery.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectModular endoprosthesis
dc.subjectMandibular reconstruction
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-05-25T07:53:51Z
dc.contributor.departmentDENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.010
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
dc.description.volume40
dc.description.issue8
dc.description.pageE487-E497
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
FEA modular endoprosthesis.pdfPublished version1.97 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.