Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00549-5
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePromoting HIV Testing by Men: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences and Predict Uptake of Community-based Testing in Uganda
dc.contributor.authorSchaffer, Elisabeth M
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Juan Marcos
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Stephanie B
dc.contributor.authorKwarisiima, Dalsone
dc.contributor.authorChamie, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorThirumurthy, Harsha
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-22T04:44:49Z
dc.date.available2023-05-22T04:44:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifier.citationSchaffer, Elisabeth M, Gonzalez, Juan Marcos, Wheeler, Stephanie B, Kwarisiima, Dalsone, Chamie, Gabriel, Thirumurthy, Harsha (2020-06). Promoting HIV Testing by Men: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Preferences and Predict Uptake of Community-based Testing in Uganda. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 18 (3) : 413-432. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00549-5
dc.identifier.issn1175-5652
dc.identifier.issn1179-1896
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/239615
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: HIV testing is essential to access HIV treatment and care and plays a critical role in preventing transmission. Despite this, testing coverage is low among men in sub-Saharan Africa. Community-based testing has demonstrated potential to expand male testing coverage, yet scant evidence reveals how community-based services can be designed to optimize testing uptake. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit preferences and predict uptake of community-based testing by men in Uganda. Methods: Hypothetical choices between alternative community-based testing services and the option to opt-out of testing were presented to a random, population-based sample of 203 adult male residents. The testing alternatives varied by service delivery model (community health campaign, counselor-administered home-based testing, distribution of HIV self-test kits at local pharmacies), availability of multi-disease testing, access to antiretroviral therapy (ART), and provision of a US$0.85 incentive. We estimated preferences using a random parameters logit model and explored whether preferences varied by participant characteristics through subgroup analyses. We simulated uptake when a single and when two community-based testing services are made available, using reference values of observed uptake to calibrate predictions. Results: The share of the adult male population predicted to test for HIV ranged from 0.15 to 0.91 when a single community-based testing service is made available and from 0.50 to 0.96 when two community-based services are provided concurrently. ART access was the strongest driver of choices (relative importance [RI] = 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-4.29), followed by the service delivery model (RI = 1.27, 95% CI 0.72-1.82) and availability of multi-disease testing (RI = 1.27, 95% CI 0.09-2.45). A US$0.85 incentive had the least yet still significant influence on choices (RI = 0.77, 95% CI 0.06-1.49). Men who perceived their risk of having HIV to be relatively elevated had higher predicted uptake of HIV self-test kits at local pharmacies, as did young adult men compared to men aged ≥ 30 years. Men who earned ≤ the daily median income had higher predicted uptake of all community-based testing services versus men who earned above the daily median income. Conclusion: Substantial opportunity exists to optimize the delivery of HIV testing to expand uptake by men; using an innovative DCE, we deliver timely, actionable guidance for promoting community-based testing by men in Uganda. We advance the stated preference literature methodologically by describing how we constructed and evaluated a pragmatic experimental design, used interaction terms to conduct subgroup analyses, and harnessed participant-specific preference estimates to predict and calibrate testing uptake.
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-05-19T07:55:17Z
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1007/s40258-019-00549-5
dc.description.sourcetitleApplied Health Economics and Health Policy
dc.description.volume18
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page413-432
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Schaffer_2020_DCE HIV Testing Preferences.pdfPublished version990.35 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.