Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1145/3563357.3566167
DC FieldValue
dc.titleComfortLearn: Enabling agent-based occupant-centric building controls
dc.contributor.authorQuintana, M
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Z
dc.contributor.authorTartarini, F
dc.contributor.authorSchiavon, S
dc.contributor.authorMiller, C
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T02:28:04Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T02:28:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-09
dc.identifier.citationQuintana, M, Nagy, Z, Tartarini, F, Schiavon, S, Miller, C (2022-11-09). ComfortLearn: Enabling agent-based occupant-centric building controls. BuildSys '22: The 9th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation : 475-478. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563357.3566167
dc.identifier.isbn9781450398909
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/236543
dc.description.abstractThe intersection of buildings control and thermal comfort modeling may seem obvious, but there are still prevalent challenges in combining them. "Occupant centric"control strategies are mainly trained using building data but rarely leverage occupants' feedback. While thermal comfort models are developed using occupants' data but are seldom integrated into building controls. To bridge this gap, we developed an open-source simulation tool named ComfortLearn. ComfortLearn is an OpenAI Gym-based environment that leverages historical building management system data from real buildings and existing longitudinal thermal comfort datasets for occupant-centric control strategies and benchmarking. We used an evaluation metric named 'exceedance' to evaluate occupants' thermal comfort and provide a more realistic picture than traditional evaluations like comfort bands. This setup allows the analysis of different building control strategies and their effect on real occupants, based on empirical data, without the need for computationally expensive co-simulations. A theoretical case study implementation shows that an as-is schedule-based controller complies with its comfort band more than 93% of the time, but the simulated occupants are comfortable for only 25% of the occupied time.
dc.publisherACM
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.date.updated2023-01-29T12:26:09Z
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.contributor.departmentTHE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
dc.description.doi10.1145/3563357.3566167
dc.description.sourcetitleBuildSys '22: The 9th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
dc.description.page475-478
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
rlem22-final80.pdfAccepted version988.35 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.