Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113764
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCan Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?
dc.contributor.authorSaeedikhani, Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorVafakhah, Sareh
dc.contributor.authorBlackwood, Daniel J
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T00:57:57Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T00:57:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.identifier.citationSaeedikhani, Mohsen, Vafakhah, Sareh, Blackwood, Daniel J (2022-06-01). Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates?. MATERIALS 15 (11). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113764
dc.identifier.issn19961944
dc.identifier.issn19961944
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/235477
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, the finite element method was used to simulate the response of the scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) across an iron–zinc cut-edge sample in order to provide a deeper understanding of the localized corrosion rates measured using SVET. It was found that, if the diffusion layer was neglected, the simulated current density using the Laplace equation fitted the experimental SVET current density perfectly. However, the electrolyte was not perturbed by a vibrating SVET probe in the field, so a diffusion layer existed. Therefore, the SVET current densities obtained from the local conductivity of the electrolyte would likely be more representative of the true corrosion rates than the SVET current densities obtained from the bulk conductivity. To help overcome this difference between natural conditions and those imposed by the SVET experiment, a local electrolyte corrected conductivity SVET (LECC-SVET) current density was introduced, which was obtained by replacing the bulk electrolyte conductivity measured experimentally by the local electrolyte conductivity simulated using the Nernst−Einstein equation. Although the LECC-SVET current density did not fit the experimental SVET current density as perfectly as that obtained from the Laplace equation, it likely represents current densities closer to the true, unperturbed corrosion conditions than the SVET data from the bulk conductivity.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectChemistry, Physical
dc.subjectMaterials Science, Multidisciplinary
dc.subjectMetallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering
dc.subjectPhysics, Applied
dc.subjectPhysics, Condensed Matter
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectMaterials Science
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectSVET
dc.subjectconductivity
dc.subjectdiffusion
dc.subjectcurrent density
dc.subjectFEM
dc.subjectVIBRATING ELECTRODE TECHNIQUE
dc.subjectPROTECTION MECHANISMS
dc.subjectCUT-EDGES
dc.subjectSTEEL
dc.subjectRESISTANCE
dc.subjectSURFACE
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-12-11T01:04:23Z
dc.contributor.departmentMATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.3390/ma15113764
dc.description.sourcetitleMATERIALS
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue11
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Can Finite Element Method Obtain SVET Current Densities Closer to True Localized Corrosion Rates.pdfPublished version2.41 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.