Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101389
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDo senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
dc.contributor.authorWaaijer, Mariette EC
dc.contributor.authorGunn, David A
dc.contributor.authorvan Heemst, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSlagboom, P Eline
dc.contributor.authorSedivy, John M
dc.contributor.authorDirks, Roeland W
dc.contributor.authorTanke, Hans J
dc.contributor.authorWestendorp, Rudi GJ
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Andrea B
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T09:12:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T09:12:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.identifier.citationWaaijer, Mariette EC, Gunn, David A, van Heemst, Diana, Slagboom, P Eline, Sedivy, John M, Dirks, Roeland W, Tanke, Hans J, Westendorp, Rudi GJ, Maier, Andrea B (2018-02-01). Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?. AGING-US 10 (2) : 278-289. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101389
dc.identifier.issn1945-4589
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/234940
dc.description.abstractLittle is known on how well senescence markers in vitro and in situ correlate within individual donors. We studied correlations between the same and different in vitro markers. Furthermore, we tested correlations between in vitro markers with in situ p16INK4a positivity. From 100 donors (20-91 years), cultured dermal fibroblasts were assessed for reactive oxygen species (ROS), telomere-associated foci (TAF), p16INK4a and senescence-associated β-gal (SAβ-gal), with/without 0.6 μM rotenone for 3 days (short-term). In fibroblasts from 40 donors, telomere shortening, ROS and SAβ-gal were additionally assessed, with/without 20 nM rotenone for 7 weeks (long-term). In skin from 52 donors, the number of p16INK4a positive dermal cells was assessed in situ. More than half of the correlations of the same senescence markers in vitro between duplicate experiments and between short-term versus long-term experiments were significant. Half of the different senescence marker correlations were significant within the short-term and within the long-term experiments. The different senescence markers in vitro were not significantly correlated intra-individually with in situ p16INK4a positivity. In conclusion, the same and different senescence markers are frequently correlated significantly within and between in vitro experiments, but in vitro senescence markers are not correlated with p16INK4a positivity in situ.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIMPACT JOURNALS LLC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectCell Biology
dc.subjectGeriatrics & Gerontology
dc.subjectcellular senescence
dc.subjectcorrelation
dc.subjectmarkers
dc.subjectin vitro
dc.subjectin situ
dc.subjectSTRESS-INDUCED RESPONSES
dc.subjectDIPLOID CELL STRAINS
dc.subjectREPLICATIVE CAPACITY
dc.subjectDERMAL FIBROBLASTS
dc.subjectBETA-GALACTOSIDASE
dc.subjectBIOLOGICAL AGE
dc.subjectVIVO
dc.subjectIDENTIFICATION
dc.subjectCONTRIBUTES
dc.subjectCULTIVATION
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-11-29T03:00:32Z
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.18632/aging.101389
dc.description.sourcetitleAGING-US
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page278-289
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors.pdfSubmitted version1.4 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.