Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110987
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe implications of using organic-rich industrial wastewater as biomethanation feedstocks
dc.contributor.authorMancini, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorTian, Hailin
dc.contributor.authorAngelidaki, Irini
dc.contributor.authorFotidis, Ioannis A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T09:20:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T09:20:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.citationMancini, Enrico, Tian, Hailin, Angelidaki, Irini, Fotidis, Ioannis A. (2021-07-01). The implications of using organic-rich industrial wastewater as biomethanation feedstocks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 144 : 110987. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110987
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233846
dc.description.abstractAcetic acid and methanol are found in wastewater of many industries and they can be excellent substrates for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, the research determining the efficient use of these wastewater as AD substrates and evaluating their impact on the AD process is scarce. The current study aims to assess the use of acetic acid-rich (WW-HAc) and methanol-rich (WW–MeOH) wastewater for methane production by evaluating (1) their effect on the AD process pH, (2) their toxicity on a typical non-acclimated methanogenic inoculum, (3) their effect on the methanogenic activity and (4) their effect on the acetate metabolic pathway when co-digested in continuous, manure-based anaerobic reactors. The pH experimental results showed that an organic loading (OL) of 5.97 g VS L?1 of WW-HAc lowered the pH below the optimum range for AD (6.5–8.5). The toxicity test on AD process showed that IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was 6.9 and 14.31 g VS L?1 for WW-HAc and WW-MeOH, respectively. In the continuous reactors experiment, high organic loading rates of up to 5.7 and 9.7 g VS L?1 d?1 for WW-HAc and WW-MeOH, respectively, where achieved under steady state (i.e., less than 10% variation in production), with 79% and 87%, respectively of the maximum theoretical methane production. Radioisotopic analysis showed that aceticlastic methanogenesis was dominant in both reactors. Overall, the assessment of using acetic acid-rich and methanol-rich wastewater as substrates, revealed significant production benefits for the AD process together with operational restrictions that must be followed to prevent toxicities or overloading effects. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectAcetic acid
dc.subjectAnaerobic co-digestion
dc.subjectCow manure
dc.subjectCSTR
dc.subjectMethanogenic pathway
dc.subjectMethanol
dc.subjectRadioisotope
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentNUS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.rser.2021.110987
dc.description.sourcetitleRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
dc.description.volume144
dc.description.page110987
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_rser_2021_110987.pdf6.46 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons