Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246420
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe unspoken reality of gender bias in surgery: A qualitative systematic review
dc.contributor.authorLim, Wen Hui
dc.contributor.authorWong, Chloe
dc.contributor.authorJain, Sneha Rajiv
dc.contributor.authorNg, Cheng Han
dc.contributor.authorTai, Chia Hui
dc.contributor.authorKamala Devi, M.
dc.contributor.authorSamarasekera, Dujeepa D.
dc.contributor.authorIyer, Shridhar Ganpathi
dc.contributor.authorChong, Choon Seng
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T09:15:18Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T09:15:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-02
dc.identifier.citationLim, Wen Hui, Wong, Chloe, Jain, Sneha Rajiv, Ng, Cheng Han, Tai, Chia Hui, Kamala Devi, M., Samarasekera, Dujeepa D., Iyer, Shridhar Ganpathi, Chong, Choon Seng (2021-02-02). The unspoken reality of gender bias in surgery: A qualitative systematic review. PLoS ONE 16 (2-Feb) : e0246420. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246420
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233772
dc.description.abstractObjective This study was conducted to better understand the pervasive gender barriers obstructing the progression of women in surgery by synthesising the perspectives of both female surgical trainees and surgeons. Methods Five electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection, were searched for relevant articles. Following a full-text review by three authors, qualitative data was synthesized thematically according to the Thomas and Harden methodology and quality assessment was conducted by two authors reaching a consensus. Results Fourteen articles were included, with unfavorable work environments, male-dominated culture and societal pressures being major themes. Females in surgery lacked support, faced harassment, and had unequal opportunities, which were often exacerbated by sex-blindness by their male counterparts. Mothers were especially affected, struggling to achieve a work-life balance while facing strong criticism. However, with increasing recognition of the unique professional traits of female surgeons, there is progress towards gender quality which requires continued and sustained efforts. Conclusion This systematic review sheds light on the numerous gender barriers that continue to stand in the way of female surgeons despite progress towards gender equality over the years. As the global agenda towards equality progresses, this review serves as a call-to-action to increase collective effort towards gender inclusivity which will significantly improve future health outcomes. Copyright: © 2021 Lim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0246420
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue2-Feb
dc.description.pagee0246420
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0246420.pdf769.65 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons