Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050269
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInfluence of extraction solvent on nontargeted metabolomics analysis of enrichment reactor cultures performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (Ebpr)
dc.contributor.authorSaw, Nay Min Min Thaw
dc.contributor.authorSuwanchaikasem, Pipob
dc.contributor.authorZuniga-Montanez, Rogelio
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Guanglei
dc.contributor.authorMarzinelli, Ezequiel M.
dc.contributor.authorWuertz, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Rohan B. H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T09:12:22Z
dc.date.available2022-10-26T09:12:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-26
dc.identifier.citationSaw, Nay Min Min Thaw, Suwanchaikasem, Pipob, Zuniga-Montanez, Rogelio, Qiu, Guanglei, Marzinelli, Ezequiel M., Wuertz, Stefan, Williams, Rohan B. H. (2021-04-26). Influence of extraction solvent on nontargeted metabolomics analysis of enrichment reactor cultures performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal (Ebpr). Metabolites 11 (5) : 269. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11050269
dc.identifier.issn2218-1989
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233722
dc.description.abstractMetabolome profiling is becoming more commonly used in the study of complex microbial communities and microbiomes; however, to date, little information is available concerning appropriate extraction procedures. We studied the influence of different extraction solvent mixtures on untargeted metabolomics analysis of two continuous culture enrichment communities performing enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR), with each enrichment targeting distinct populations of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs). We employed one non-polar solvent and up to four polar solvents for extracting metabolites from biomass. In one of the reactor microbial communities, we surveyed both intracellular and extracellular metabolites using the same set of solvents. All samples were analysed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). UPLC-MS data obtained from polar and non-polar solvents were analysed separately and evaluated using extent of repeatability, overall extraction capacity and the extent of differential abundance between physiological states. Despite both reactors demonstrating the same bioprocess phenotype, the most appropriate extraction method was biomass specific, with methanol: water (50:50 v/v) and methanol: chloroform: water (40:40:20 v/v) being chosen as the most appropriate for each of the two different bioreactors, respectively. Our approach provides new data on the influence of solvent choice on the untargeted surveys of the metabolome of PAO enriched EBPR communities and suggests that metabolome extraction methods need to be carefully tailored to the specific complex microbial community under study. © 2021 by the authorsLicensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectActivated sludge
dc.subjectEnhanced biological phosphorus removal
dc.subjectExtraction
dc.subjectMass spectrometry
dc.subjectMicrobial ecology
dc.subjectPolyphosphate-accumulating organisms
dc.subjectUltra-high performance liquid chromatography
dc.subjectUntargeted metabolomics
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentLIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE
dc.description.doi10.3390/metabo11050269
dc.description.sourcetitleMetabolites
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page269
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_metabo11050269.pdf6.24 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons