Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123478
DC FieldValue
dc.titleStudy on boil-off gas (Bog) minimization and recovery strategies from actual baseload lng export terminal: Towards sustainable lng chains
dc.contributor.authorBouabidi, Zineb
dc.contributor.authorAlmomani, Fares
dc.contributor.authorAl-musleh, Easa, I
dc.contributor.authorKatebah, Mary A.
dc.contributor.authorHussein, Mohamed M.
dc.contributor.authorShazed, Abdur Rahman
dc.contributor.authorKarimi, Iftekhar A.
dc.contributor.authorAlfadala, Hassan
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:36:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-11
dc.identifier.citationBouabidi, Zineb, Almomani, Fares, Al-musleh, Easa, I, Katebah, Mary A., Hussein, Mohamed M., Shazed, Abdur Rahman, Karimi, Iftekhar A., Alfadala, Hassan (2021-06-11). Study on boil-off gas (Bog) minimization and recovery strategies from actual baseload lng export terminal: Towards sustainable lng chains. Energies 14 (12) : 3478. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123478
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233174
dc.description.abstractBoil-off Gas (BOG) generated at the liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal causes negative economic and environmental impacts. Thus, the objective of this study is to develop and evaluate various handling schemes to minimize and/or recover the generated BOG from an actual baseload LNG export terminal with a capacity of 554 million standard cubic feet per day (MMSCFD) of natural gas feed. The following three main scenarios were assessed: JBOG re-liquefaction, LNG sub-cooling, and lean fuel gas (LFG) reflux. For the LNG subcooling, two sub-cases were considered; standalone subcooling before LNG storage and subcooling in the prevailing liquefaction cycle. Steadystate models for these scenarios were simulated using Aspen Plus® based on a shortcut approach to quickly evaluate the proposed scenarios and determine the promising options that should be considered for further rigorous analysis. Results indicated that the flow of attainable excess LNG is 0.07, 0.03, and 0.022 million metric tons per annum (MTA) for the standalone LNG sub-cooling, LNG sub-cooling in the main cryogenic heat exchanger (MCHE), and both LFG-refluxing and jetty boil-off gas (JBOG) liquefaction, respectively. This in turn results in a profit of 24.58, 12.24, 8.14, and 7.63 million $/year for the LNG price of 7$ per Metric Million British Thermal Unit (MMBtu) of LNG. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectBOG recovery
dc.subjectBoil-off-gas
dc.subjectC3MR process
dc.subjectExporting terminal
dc.subjectFlare minimization
dc.subjectFuel balance
dc.subjectLiquefied natural gas
dc.subjectSteady-state simulation
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOLLEGE OF DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.3390/en14123478
dc.description.sourcetitleEnergies
dc.description.volume14
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page3478
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_en14123478.pdf4.71 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons