Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2196/29789
DC FieldValue
dc.titleExamining the utility of social media in covid-19 vaccination: Unsupervised learning of 672,133 twitter posts
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Tau Ming
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cia Sin
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T07:31:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T07:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-03
dc.identifier.citationLiew, Tau Ming, Lee, Cia Sin (2021-11-03). Examining the utility of social media in covid-19 vaccination: Unsupervised learning of 672,133 twitter posts. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7 (11) : e29789. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2196/29789
dc.identifier.issn2369-2960
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233100
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although COVID-19 vaccines have recently become available, efforts in global mass vaccination can be hampered by the widespread issue of vaccine hesitancy. Objective: The aim of this study was to use social media data to capture close-to-real-time public perspectives and sentiments regarding COVID-19 vaccines, with the intention to understand the key issues that have captured public attention, as well as the barriers and facilitators to successful COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Twitter was searched for tweets related to "COVID-19" and "vaccine" over an 11-week period after November 18, 2020, following a press release regarding the first effective vaccine. An unsupervised machine learning approach (ie, structural topic modeling) was used to identify topics from tweets, with each topic further grouped into themes using manually conducted thematic analysis as well as guided by the theoretical framework of the COM-B (capability, opportunity, and motivation components of behavior) model. Sentiment analysis of the tweets was also performed using the rule-based machine learning model VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner). Results: Tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines were posted by individuals around the world (N=672,133). Six overarching themes were identified: (1) emotional reactions related to COVID-19 vaccines (19.3%), (2) public concerns related to COVID-19 vaccines (19.6%), (3) discussions about news items related to COVID-19 vaccines (13.3%), (4) public health communications about COVID-19 vaccines (10.3%), (5) discussions about approaches to COVID-19 vaccination drives (17.1%), and (6) discussions about the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines (20.3%). Tweets with negative sentiments largely fell within the themes of emotional reactions and public concerns related to COVID-19 vaccines. Tweets related to facilitators of vaccination showed temporal variations over time, while tweets related to barriers remained largely constant throughout the study period. Conclusions: The findings from this study may facilitate the formulation of comprehensive strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake; they highlight the key processes that require attention in the planning of COVID-19 vaccination and provide feedback on evolving barriers and facilitators in ongoing vaccination drives to allow for further policy tweaks. The findings also illustrate three key roles of social media in COVID-19 vaccination, as follows: Surveillance and monitoring, a communication platform, and evaluation of government responses. © 2021 JMIR Research Protocols. All rights reserved.
dc.publisherJMIR Publications Inc.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectInfodemiology
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectNatural language processing
dc.subjectSocial media
dc.subjectVaccine hesitancy
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.2196/29789
dc.description.sourcetitleJMIR Public Health and Surveillance
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.pagee29789
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_2196_29789.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons