Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02226-6
DC FieldValue
dc.titleVisceral fat area is the measure of obesity best associated with mobility disability in community dwelling oldest-old Chinese adults
dc.contributor.authorChua, Kevin Yiqiang
dc.contributor.authorLin, Xinyi
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yeli
dc.contributor.authorChong, Yap-Seng
dc.contributor.authorLim, Wee-Shiong
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Woon-Puay
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T06:46:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T06:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-28
dc.identifier.citationChua, Kevin Yiqiang, Lin, Xinyi, Wang, Yeli, Chong, Yap-Seng, Lim, Wee-Shiong, Koh, Woon-Puay (2021-04-28). Visceral fat area is the measure of obesity best associated with mobility disability in community dwelling oldest-old Chinese adults. BMC Geriatrics 21 (1) : 282. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02226-6
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233063
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although obesity can be clinically defined by body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, percent body fat, or visceral fat area, it is unclear which specific measure is best associated with mobility disability in oldest-old adults. Methods: Among 589 Chinese participants aged 85 years and older in a population-based cohort in Singapore, we measured waist circumference, computed BMI, estimated appendicular skeletal muscle mass, percent body fat, and visceral fat area using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and evaluated mobility disability using the Loco-Check questionnaire. We computed areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) to compare how well these measures discriminated between those with and without mobility disability. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between obesity defined by these measures and mobility disability. Results: Compared to BMI, which had an AUCROC (95% CI) of 0.68 (0.64–0.72) for the discrimination of mobility disability, only visceral fat area had a significantly higher discriminative performance [AUCROC (95% CI) of 0.71 (0.67–0.75) (Padjusted = 0.002)]. The optimal cut-offs of visceral fat area for the discrimination of mobility disability were ? 104 cm2 in men and ? 137 cm2 in women. In fully adjusted models, only obesity defined by visceral fat area was significantly associated with mobility disability [OR (95% CI) of 2.04 (1.10–3.77)]; obesity defined by the other measures were not associated with mobility disability after adjusting for visceral fat. Conclusion: In oldest-old adults, visceral fat area was the best discriminator for obesity associated with mobility disability. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
dc.subjectBody mass index (BMI)
dc.subjectLocomotive syndrome
dc.subjectMobility disability
dc.subjectPercent body fat
dc.subjectVisceral fat area
dc.subjectWaist circumference
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12877-021-02226-6
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Geriatrics
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page282
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12877-021-02226-6.pdf453.34 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons