Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413282
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe validation and improvement of a food literacy behavior checklist for food literacy programs
dc.contributor.authorPaynter, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorBegley, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorButcher, Lucy M.
dc.contributor.authorDhaliwal, Satvinder S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T06:41:31Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T06:41:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-16
dc.identifier.citationPaynter, Ellen, Begley, Andrea, Butcher, Lucy M., Dhaliwal, Satvinder S. (2021-12-16). The validation and improvement of a food literacy behavior checklist for food literacy programs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (24) : 13282. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413282
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/233007
dc.description.abstractFood literacy is a multidimensional construct required to achieve diet quality. The Food Sensations® for Adults (FSA) program aims to improve the food literacy of low to middle-income adults living in Western Australia and is funded by the Western Australian Department of Health. The original published behavior checklist used to measure change in food literacy has been revised based on experience of the facilitators and the iterative development of the program. This research sought to assess the validity and reliability of the improved food literacy behavior checklist. A total of 1,359 participants completed the checklist over an 18-month period. Content, face, and construct validity were considered in the re-development of the checklist. An exploratory factor analysis of the checklist identified three factors: 1) Plan and Manage, 2) Selection, and 3) Preparation. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.883, 0.760, and 0.868 were found for each of the three factors re-spectively. These coefficients indicated good internal consistency and were higher than those found in the original checklist analysis. An external validation was undertaken with the original food literacy behavior checklist, and a strong positive relationship between the two tools was found. In addition to being used to evaluate FSA, this revised and extensively validated tool could provide guidance to others evaluating similar food literacy programs and contribute to international measurement research. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectFood literacy
dc.subjectLow income
dc.subjectMeasurement
dc.subjectScale
dc.subjectValidity
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.3390/ijerph182413282
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.description.volume18
dc.description.issue24
dc.description.page13282
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_ijerph182413282.pdf4.23 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons