Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.004
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSupport for market-based and command-and-control congestion relief policies in Latin American cities: Effects of mobility, environmental health, and city-level factors
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xize
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorMahendra, Anjali
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T01:20:00Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T01:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-01
dc.identifier.citationWang, Xize, Rodríguez, D.A., Mahendra, Anjali (2021-04-01). Support for market-based and command-and-control congestion relief policies in Latin American cities: Effects of mobility, environmental health, and city-level factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 146 : 91-108. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.004
dc.identifier.issn0965-8564
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232939
dc.description.abstractPublic support for the implementation of congestion relief policies is critical for the policies’ technical and political success. To identify the personal, social, and city-level factors associated with higher acceptance towards such policies, this study uses a 2016 survey of 8178 residents from 11 cities across 10 Latin American countries collected by the Development Bank of Latin America (Corporación Andina de Fomento or CAF). We examined support for two demand-side approaches to managing the traffic congestion externality: congestion pricing – a market-based approach, and driving restrictions or bans – a command-and-control approach. Logit regression models show that personal mobility such as owning or using a private vehicle during a respondent's main commute trip are associated with decreased support, while higher congestion delay in one's commute and having a young child recently diagnosed with respiratory problems increases support for either congestion relief policy. In addition, residents of cities with higher levels of median annual particulate matter and with prior experience with traffic bans expressed higher support for either policy. Residents of cities with higher income inequality supported only driving restrictions; while those of cities with higher GDP per capita had lower support only for congestion pricing. To improve the public acceptance of congestion relief policies in Latin America, policy makers could: (1) explicitly seek to mitigate the costs it brings on individuals by investing in substitutes like public transportation; (2) promote the personal and social environmental and health benefits; (3) consider beginning with temporary, pilot programs; and in the case of driving restrictions, (4) take into account city-specific conditions related to income inequality that may influence public support for the policies. © 2021 The Authors
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectAutomobile regulation
dc.subjectCongestion pricing
dc.subjectDriving restrictions
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectPublic acceptance
dc.subjectTraffic demand management
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.004
dc.description.sourcetitleTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
dc.description.volume146
dc.description.page91-108
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_tra_2020_12_004.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons