Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100052
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNew proteomic signatures to distinguish between zika and dengue infections
dc.contributor.authorAllgoewer, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorMaity, Shuvadeep
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Alice
dc.contributor.authorLashua, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorRamgopal, Moti
dc.contributor.authorBalkaran, Beni N.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Liyun
dc.contributor.authorPurushwani, Savita
dc.contributor.authorArévalo, M.T.
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Ted M.
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hyungwon
dc.contributor.authorGhedin, Elodie
dc.contributor.authorVogel, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T01:15:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T01:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifier.citationAllgoewer, Kristina, Maity, Shuvadeep, Zhao, Alice, Lashua, Lauren, Ramgopal, Moti, Balkaran, Beni N., Liu, Liyun, Purushwani, Savita, Arévalo, M.T., Ross, Ted M., Choi, Hyungwon, Ghedin, Elodie, Vogel, Christine (2021-01-01). New proteomic signatures to distinguish between zika and dengue infections. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 20 : 100052. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100052
dc.identifier.issn1535-9476
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232868
dc.description.abstractDistinguishing between Zika and dengue virus infections is critical for accurate treatment, but we still lack detailed understanding of their impact on their host. To identify new protein signatures of the two infections, we used next-generation proteomics to profile 122 serum samples from 62 Zika and dengue patients. We quantified >500 proteins and identified 13 proteins that were significantly differentially expressed (adjusted p-value < 0.05). These proteins typically function in infection and wound healing, with several also linked to pregnancy and brain function. We successfully validated expression differences with Carbonic Anhydrase 2 in both the original and an independent sample set. Three of the differentially expressed proteins, i.e., Fibrinogen Alpha, Platelet Factor 4 Variant 1, and Pro-Platelet Basic Protein, predicted Zika virus infection at a ~70% true-positive and 6% false-positive rate. Further, we showed that intraindividual temporal changes in protein signatures can disambiguate diagnoses and serve as indicators for past infections. Taken together, we demonstrate that serum proteomics can provide new resources that serve to distinguish between different viral infections. © 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100052
dc.description.sourcetitleMolecular and Cellular Proteomics
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.page100052
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_mcpro_2021_100052.pdf3.27 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons