Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.11.025
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA point prevalence survey to assess antibiotic prescribing in patients hospitalized with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
dc.contributor.authorTan, Sock Hoon
dc.contributor.authorNg, Tat Ming
dc.contributor.authorTay, Hui Lin
dc.contributor.authorYap, Min Yi
dc.contributor.authorHeng, Shi Thong
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Audrey Yong Xin
dc.contributor.authorTeng, Christine B.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tau Hong
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T01:14:00Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T01:14:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.identifier.citationTan, Sock Hoon, Ng, Tat Ming, Tay, Hui Lin, Yap, Min Yi, Heng, Shi Thong, Loo, Audrey Yong Xin, Teng, Christine B., Lee, Tau Hong (2021-03-01). A point prevalence survey to assess antibiotic prescribing in patients hospitalized with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 24 : 45-47. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.11.025
dc.identifier.issn2213-7165
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232834
dc.description.abstractBackground: Earlier studies have reported high antibiotic use in patients hospitalised for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulting in concerns of increasing antimicrobial resistance with increase antibiotic use in this pandemic. Point prevalence survey (PPS) can be a quick tool to provide antibiotic prescribing information to aid antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities. Objectives: To describe antibiotic utilization and evaluate antibiotic appropriateness in COVID-19 patients using PPS. Methods: Adapting Global-PPS on antimicrobial use, the survey was conducted in COVID-19 wards at 2 centres in Singapore on 22 April 2020 at 0800h. Patients on systemic antibiotics were included and evaluated for antibiotic appropriateness. Results: Five hundred and seventy-seven patients were screened. Thirty-six (6.2%) patients were on antibiotics and which were started at median of 7 days (inter-quartile rate (IQR), 4, 11) from symptom onset. Fifty-one antibiotics were prescribed in these patients. Overall, co-amoxiclav (26/51, 51.0%) was the most often prescribed antibiotic. Thirty-one out of 51 (60.8%) antibiotic prescriptions were appropriate. Among 20 inappropriate prescriptions, 18 (90.0%) were initiated in patients with low likelihood of bacterial infections. Antibiotic prescriptions were more appropriate when reviewed by infectious diseases physicians (13/31 [41.9%] versus 2/20 [10.0%], p = 0.015), and if reasons for use were stated in notes (31/31 [100.0%] versus 16/20 [80.0%], p = 0.019). Conclusions: Despite low prevalence of antibiotic use among confirmed and suspected COVID-19 patients at 2 centres in Singapore, there was significant proportion of inappropriate antibiotics use where bacterial infections were unlikely. AMS teams can tailor stewardship strategies using PPS results. © 2020 The Author(s)
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectAntibiotic
dc.subjectCoronavirus
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectPoint prevalence survey
dc.subjectStewardship
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentPHARMACY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jgar.2020.11.025
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.page45-47
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_jgar_2020_11_025.pdf236.61 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons