Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4275
DC FieldValue
dc.titleFactors predicting improved compliance towards colonoscopy in individuals with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT)
dc.contributor.authorLim, Tian-Zhi
dc.contributor.authorLau, Jerrald
dc.contributor.authorWong, Gretel Jianlin
dc.contributor.authorTan, Lavine Yen-Ting
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yu-Jing
dc.contributor.authorNatarajan, Karthiga
dc.contributor.authorYi, Huso
dc.contributor.authorWong, Mee-Lian
dc.contributor.authorTan, Ker-Kan
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T01:11:30Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T01:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-14
dc.identifier.citationLim, Tian-Zhi, Lau, Jerrald, Wong, Gretel Jianlin, Tan, Lavine Yen-Ting, Chang, Yu-Jing, Natarajan, Karthiga, Yi, Huso, Wong, Mee-Lian, Tan, Ker-Kan (2021-09-14). Factors predicting improved compliance towards colonoscopy in individuals with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Cancer Medicine 10 (21) : 7735-7746. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4275
dc.identifier.issn2045-7634
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232794
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in any colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme is integral. However, many individuals who had a positive FIT declined colonoscopy subsequently. This study aims to uncover the predictors on completion of colonoscopy using the Health Belief Model (HBM) between individuals who complete and those who did not after a positive FIT. Methods: A mixed-method study comprising qualitative semi-structured interviews followed by a locally validated questionnaire in Singapore was prospectively administered via telephone interview to average risk individuals with positive FIT results from a cohort of the national FIT screening database referred for follow-up colonoscopic evaluation. Results: A total of 394 individuals, with a median age of 66 years (range, 46–89 years), were recruited. Fifty percent completed follow-up colonoscopic evaluation and formed the “doers” group. All participants demonstrated high knowledge of symptoms of CRC and awareness and qualitative responses were aligned to the various HBM domains. Using multi-variable analysis, doers felt that medical recommendations (odds ratio [OR], 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23–4.63, p = 0.01) and mainstream media publicity (OR, 2.16, 95% CI: 1.09–4.26, p = 0.026) were important. Non-doers showed positive association with perceived barriers such as cost (OR, 2.15, 95% CI: 1.10–4.20, p = 0.026) and inconvenience (OR, 3.44, 95% CI: 1.50–7.89, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Identified factors such as tackling perceived barriers, public health education and active promotion by medical physicians, family and friends could help guide subsequent interventions to improve compliance of individuals with positive FIT to undergo follow-up colonoscopy. © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer
dc.subjectcompliance
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjecthealth belief model
dc.subjectscreening
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.description.doi10.1002/cam4.4275
dc.description.sourcetitleCancer Medicine
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue21
dc.description.page7735-7746
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1002_cam4_4275.pdf413.76 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons