Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01156-4
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMonophyletic blowflies revealed by phylogenomics
dc.contributor.authorYan, Liping
dc.contributor.authorPape, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMeusemann, Karen
dc.contributor.authorKutty, Sujatha Narayanan
dc.contributor.authorMeier, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorBayless, Keith M.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Dong
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T01:05:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T01:05:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-27
dc.identifier.citationYan, Liping, Pape, Thomas, Meusemann, Karen, Kutty, Sujatha Narayanan, Meier, Rudolf, Bayless, Keith M., Zhang, Dong (2021-10-27). Monophyletic blowflies revealed by phylogenomics. BMC Biology 19 (1) : 230. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01156-4
dc.identifier.issn1741-7007
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232702
dc.description.abstractBackground: Blowflies are ubiquitous insects, often shiny and metallic, and the larvae of many species provide important ecosystem services (e.g., recycling carrion) and are used in forensics and debridement therapy. Yet, the taxon has repeatedly been recovered to be para- or polyphyletic, and the lack of a well-corroborated phylogeny has prevented a robust classification. Results: We here resolve the relationships between the different blowfly subclades by including all recognized subfamilies in a phylogenomic analysis using 2221 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes of Diptera. Maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and coalescent-based phylogeny reconstructions all support the same relationships for the full data set. Based on this backbone phylogeny, blowflies are redefined as the most inclusive monophylum within the superfamily Oestroidea not containing Mesembrinellidae, Mystacinobiidae, Oestridae, Polleniidae, Sarcophagidae, Tachinidae, and Ulurumyiidae. The constituent subfamilies are re-classified as Ameniinae (including the Helicoboscinae, syn. nov.), Bengaliinae, Calliphorinae (including Aphyssurinae, syn. nov., Melanomyinae, syn. nov., and Toxotarsinae, syn. nov.), Chrysomyinae, Luciliinae, Phumosiinae, Rhiniinae stat. rev., and Rhinophorinae stat. rev. Metallic coloration in the adult is shown to be widespread but does not emerge as the most likely ground plan feature. Conclusions: Our study provides the first phylogeny of oestroid calyptrates including all blowfly subfamilies. This allows settling a long-lasting controversy in Diptera by redefining blowflies as a well-supported monophylum, and blowfly classification is adjusted accordingly. The archetypical blowfly trait of carrion-feeding maggots most likely evolved twice, and the metallic color may not belong to the blowfly ground plan. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectCalyptratae
dc.subjectColoration
dc.subjectGenome
dc.subjectPhylogeny
dc.subjectTranscriptome
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentTROPICAL MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12915-021-01156-4
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Biology
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page230
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12915-021-01156-4.pdf3.34 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons