Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112646
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEncapsulation of lutein via microfluidic technology: Evaluation of stability and in vitro bioaccessibility
dc.contributor.authorYao, Yuanhang
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jiaxing Jansen
dc.contributor.authorChee, Xin Yi Jolene
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Mei Hui
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Saif A.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung Eun
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T07:59:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T07:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01
dc.identifier.citationYao, Yuanhang, Lin, Jiaxing Jansen, Chee, Xin Yi Jolene, Liu, Mei Hui, Khan, Saif A., Kim, Jung Eun (2021-11-01). Encapsulation of lutein via microfluidic technology: Evaluation of stability and in vitro bioaccessibility. Foods 10 (11) : 2646. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112646
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232374
dc.description.abstractInadequate intake of lutein is relevant to a higher risk of age-related eye diseases. However, lutein has been barely incorporated into foods efficiently because it is prone to degradation and is poorly bioaccessible in the gastrointestinal tract. Microfluidics, a novel food processing technology that can control fluid flows at the microscale, can enable the efficient encapsulation of bioactive compounds by fabricating suitable delivery structures. Hence, the present study aimed to evaluate the stability and the bioaccessibility of lutein that is encapsulated in a new noodle-like product made via microfluidic technology. Two types of oils (safflower oil (SO) and olive oil (OL)) were selected as a delivery vehicle for lutein, and two customized microfluidic devices (co-flow and combination-flow) were used. Lutein encapsulation was created by the following: (i) co-flow + SO, (ii) co-flow + OL, (iii) combination-flow + SO, and (iv) combination-flow + OL. The initial encapsulation of lutein in the noodle-like product was achieved at 86.0 ± 2.7%. Although lutein’s stability experienced a decreasing trend, the retention of lutein was maintained above 60% for up to seven days of storage. The two types of device did not result in a difference in lutein bioaccessibility (co-flow: 3.1 ± 0.5%; combination-flow: 3.6 ± 0.6%) and SO and OL also showed no difference in lutein bioaccessibility (SO: 3.4 ± 0.8%; OL: 3.3 ± 0.4%). These results suggest that the types of oil and device do not affect the lutein bioaccessibility. Findings from this study may provide scientific insights into emulsion-based delivery systems that employ microfluidics for the encapsulation of bioactive compounds into foods. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectBioaccessibility
dc.subjectEncapsulation
dc.subjectLutein
dc.subjectMicrofluidics
dc.subjectStability
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOLLEGE OF DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentFOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.3390/foods10112646
dc.description.sourcetitleFoods
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page2646
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_foods10112646.pdf5.66 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons