Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00087-3
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDevelopment and internal validation of machine learning algorithms to predict patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Siyuan
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jerry Yongqiang
dc.contributor.authorPang, Hee Nee
dc.contributor.authorLo, Ngai Nung
dc.contributor.authorYeo, Seng Jin
dc.contributor.authorLiow, Ming Han Lincoln
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T07:54:35Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T07:54:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-02
dc.identifier.citationZhang, Siyuan, Chen, Jerry Yongqiang, Pang, Hee Nee, Lo, Ngai Nung, Yeo, Seng Jin, Liow, Ming Han Lincoln (2021-09-02). Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms to predict patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 3 (1) : 33. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00087-3
dc.identifier.issn2524-7948
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232296
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patient satisfaction is a unique and important measure of success after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our study aimed to evaluate the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict patient satisfaction after THA. Methods: Prospectively collected data of 1508 primary THAs performed between 2006 and 2018 were extracted from our joint replacement registry and split into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Supervised ML algorithms (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machines, Logistic LASSO) were developed with the training set, using patient demographics, comorbidities and preoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Short Form-36 [SF-36], physical component summary [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS], Western Ontario and McMaster’s Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] and Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) to predict patient satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively. Predictive performance was evaluated using the independent test set. Results: Preoperative models demonstrated fair discriminative ability in predicting patient satisfaction, with the LASSO model achieving a maximum AUC of 0.76. Permutation importance revealed that the most important predictors of dissatisfaction were (1) patient’s age, (2) preoperative WOMAC, (3) number of comorbidities, (4) preoperative MCS, (5) previous lumbar spine surgery, and (6) low BMI (< 18.5). Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms demonstrated fair discriminative ability in predicting patient satisfaction after THA. We have identified modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of postoperative satisfaction which could enhance preoperative counselling and improve health optimization prior to THA. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measures
dc.subjectSatisfaction
dc.subjectTotal hip arthroplasty
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1186/s42836-021-00087-3
dc.description.sourcetitleArthroplasty
dc.description.volume3
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page33
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s42836-021-00087-3.pdf776.01 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons