Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109105
DC FieldValue
dc.titleConservation beyond the existing protected area network is required to improve species and habitat representation in a global biodiversity hotspot
dc.contributor.authorDe Alban, Jose Don T.
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Bryan Po Ian
dc.contributor.authorVenegas-Li, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorConnette, Grant M.
dc.contributor.authorJamaludin, Johanness
dc.contributor.authorLatt, Kyaw Thinn
dc.contributor.authorOswald, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorReeder, Carl
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Edward L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T08:09:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T08:09:15Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.identifier.citationDe Alban, Jose Don T., Leong, Bryan Po Ian, Venegas-Li, Ruben, Connette, Grant M., Jamaludin, Johanness, Latt, Kyaw Thinn, Oswald, Patrick, Reeder, Carl, Webb, Edward L. (2021-05-01). Conservation beyond the existing protected area network is required to improve species and habitat representation in a global biodiversity hotspot. Biological Conservation 257 : 109105. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109105
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232232
dc.description.abstractAdequate representation of species and habitats is a critical aspect of an effective protected area (PA) network. Here, we evaluate the representation of focal wildlife species and forest types within the existing 11,241-km2 PA network of the Tanintharyi Region in southern Myanmar, a frontier forest landscape and global biodiversity hotspot, and use spatial prioritisation tools to identify additional priority areas for conservation outside the existing network that contribute towards meeting a 30% representation target. Our study showed that the current configuration of the existing PA network underrepresented 32 of 60 threatened wildlife species and 6 of 8 forest types, with mangroves being the least represented. Spatial prioritisation revealed that by protecting an additional 4032 km2 (8.4% of Tanintharyi's land area), 31% of which were adjacent to the existing PA network, the target representation for all wildlife species and forest types can be achieved. Enhancing the effectiveness of the existing network entails modest expansion by establishing additional conservation areas through various area-based conservation strategies, specifically targeting mangrove forests. Large oil palm agribusiness concessions, however, overlapped with almost 12% of priority conservation areas (consisting of additional areas and parts of the existing PA network), thereby competing with conservation interests. Expanding the area of representation will only succeed if the species and their habitats are adequately protected. Efforts therefore must prioritise the involvement and leadership of local communities and reflect local realities in negotiations among stakeholders. © 2021 The Authors
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectAgribusiness concession
dc.subjectCommunity-based conservation
dc.subjectIndo-Burma
dc.subjectMarxan
dc.subjectSoutheast Asia
dc.subjectSystematic conservation planning
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109105
dc.description.sourcetitleBiological Conservation
dc.description.volume257
dc.description.page109105
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_biocon_2021_109105.pdf6.99 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons