Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3349
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMachine learning in prediction of intrinsic aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds: Generalization, complexity, or predictive ability?
dc.contributor.authorLovri?, M.
dc.contributor.authorPavlovi?, K.
dc.contributor.authorŽuvela, P.
dc.contributor.authorSpataru, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorLu?i?, B.
dc.contributor.authorKern, Roman
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ming Wah
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T08:08:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T08:08:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-07
dc.identifier.citationLovri?, M., Pavlovi?, K., Žuvela, P., Spataru, Adrian, Lu?i?, B., Kern, Roman, Wong, Ming Wah (2021-05-07). Machine learning in prediction of intrinsic aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds: Generalization, complexity, or predictive ability?. Journal of Chemometrics 35 (7-Aug) : e3349. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3349
dc.identifier.issn0886-9383
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232224
dc.description.abstractWe present a collection of publicly available intrinsic aqueous solubility data of 829 drug-like compounds. Four different machine learning algorithms (random forests [RF], LightGBM, partial least squares, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [LASSO]) coupled with multistage permutation importance for feature selection and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization were used for the prediction of solubility based on chemical structural information. Our results show that LASSO yielded the best predictive ability on an external test set with a root mean square error (RMSE) (test) of 0.70 log points, an R2(test) of 0.80, and 105 features. Taking into account the number of descriptors as well, an RF model achieves the best balance between complexity and predictive ability with an RMSE(test) of 0.72 log points, an R2(test) of 0.78, and with only 17 features. On a more aggressive test set (principal component analysis [PCA]-based split), better generalization was observed for the RF model. We propose a ranking score for choosing the best model, as test set performance is only one of the factors in creating an applicable model. The ranking score is a weighted combination of generalization, number of features, and test performance. Out of the two best learners, a consensus model was built exhibiting the best predictive ability and generalization with RMSE(test) of 0.67 log points and a R2(test) of 0.81. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Chemometrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectconsensus modeling
dc.subjectLASSO
dc.subjectLightGBM
dc.subjectPCA
dc.subjectpermutation importance
dc.subjectQSAR
dc.subjectrandom forests
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1002/cem.3349
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Chemometrics
dc.description.volume35
dc.description.issue7-Aug
dc.description.pagee3349
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1002_cem_3349.pdf6.49 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons