Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2196/26699
DC FieldValue
dc.titleLong-term effectiveness of mHealth physical activity interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
dc.contributor.authorMönninghoff, A.
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Jan Niklas
dc.contributor.authorHess, Alexander Jan
dc.contributor.authorIsmailova, Kamila
dc.contributor.authorTeepe, Gisbert W.
dc.contributor.authorCar, Lorainne Tudor
dc.contributor.authorMüller-Riemenschneider, Falk
dc.contributor.authorKowatsch, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T07:59:58Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T07:59:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-30
dc.identifier.citationMönninghoff, A., Kramer, Jan Niklas, Hess, Alexander Jan, Ismailova, Kamila, Teepe, Gisbert W., Car, Lorainne Tudor, Müller-Riemenschneider, Falk, Kowatsch, Tobias (2021-04-30). Long-term effectiveness of mHealth physical activity interventions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 (4) : e26699. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2196/26699
dc.identifier.issn1438-8871
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/232105
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions can increase physical activity (PA); however, their long-term impact is not well understood. Objective: The primary aim of this study is to understand the immediate and long-term effects of mHealth interventions on PA. The secondary aim is to explore potential effect moderators. Methods: We performed this study according to the Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO in July 2020. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions targeting PA as a primary outcome in adults. Eligible outcome measures were walking, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), total physical activity (TPA), and energy expenditure. Where reported, we extracted data for 3 time points (ie, end of intervention, follow-up ?6 months, and follow-up >6 months). To explore effect moderators, we performed subgroup analyses by population, intervention design, and control group type. Results were summarized using random effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: Of the 2828 identified studies, 117 were included. These studies reported on 21,118 participants with a mean age of 52.03 (SD 14.14) years, of whom 58.99% (n=12,459) were female. mHealth interventions significantly increased PA across all the 4 outcome measures at the end of intervention (walking standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.46, 95% CI 0.36-0.55; P<.001; MVPA SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.21-0.35; P<.001; TPA SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.47; P<.001; energy expenditure SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.13-0.75; P=.01). Only 33 studies reported short-term follow-up measurements, and 8 studies reported long-term follow-up measurements in addition to end-of-intervention results. In the short term, effects were sustained for walking (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.42; P=.002), MVPA (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.35; P=.008), and TPA (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.13-0.93; P=.009). In the long term, effects were also sustained for walking (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.39; P=.001) and MVPA (SMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.27; P<.001). We found the study population to be an effect moderator, with higher effect scores in sick and at-risk populations. PA was increased both in scalable and nonscalable mHealth intervention designs and regardless of the control group type. The risk of bias was rated high in 80.3% (94/117) of the studies. Heterogeneity was significant, resulting in low to very low quality of evidence. Conclusions: mHealth interventions can foster small to moderate increases in PA. The effects are maintained long term; however, the effect size decreases over time. The results encourage using mHealth interventions in at-risk and sick populations and support the use of scalable mHealth intervention designs to affordably reach large populations. However, given the low evidence quality, further methodologically rigorous studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term effects. © Annette Mönninghoff, Jan Niklas Kramer, Alexander Jan Hess, Kamila Ismailova, Gisbert W Teepe, Lorainne Tudor Car, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, Tobias Kowatsch. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org),30.04.2021. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
dc.publisherJMIR Publications Inc.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2021
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectMHealth
dc.subjectMobile phone
dc.subjectPhysical activity
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.description.doi10.2196/26699
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Medical Internet Research
dc.description.volume23
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.pagee26699
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_2196_26699.pdf3.35 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons