Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.763229
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neuroprotectants for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
dc.contributor.authorLeen, AJ
dc.contributor.authorYap, DWT
dc.contributor.authorTeo, CB
dc.contributor.authorTan, BKJ
dc.contributor.authorMolassiotis, A
dc.contributor.authorIshiguro, H
dc.contributor.authorFan, SWX
dc.contributor.authorSundar, R
dc.contributor.authorSoon, YY
dc.contributor.authorBandla, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T04:31:15Z
dc.date.available2022-07-14T04:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-05
dc.identifier.citationLeen, AJ, Yap, DWT, Teo, CB, Tan, BKJ, Molassiotis, A, Ishiguro, H, Fan, SWX, Sundar, R, Soon, YY, Bandla, A (2022-01-05). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neuroprotectants for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Frontiers in Oncology 11 : 763229-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.763229
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228503
dc.description.abstractBackground: Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) is a disabling side effect of paclitaxel with few effective preventive strategies. We aim to determine the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological neuroprotective interventions in preventing PIPN incidence. Methods: Biomedical literature databases were searched from years 2000 to 2021 for trials comparing neuroprotective interventions and control. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of PIPN. Results: Of 24 relevant controlled trials, 14 were eligible for meta-analysis. Pooled results from seven non-pharmacological trials were associated with a statistically significant 48% relative reduction of PIPN risk with low heterogeneity. Conversely, pooled results from six pharmacological trials were associated with a significant 20% relative reduction of PIPN risk with moderate heterogeneity. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches appear effective in reducing PIPN incidence in the treatment arm compared to control (pooled RR < 1). Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that both interventions may reduce PIPN risk. Non-pharmacological interventions appear more effective than pharmacological interventions.
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectchemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
dc.subjectneuroprotection
dc.subjectnon-invasive
dc.subjectpaclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy
dc.subjectprevention
dc.subjecttaxane
dc.typeReview
dc.date.updated2022-07-06T08:42:05Z
dc.contributor.departmentLIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.3389/fonc.2021.763229
dc.description.sourcetitleFrontiers in Oncology
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.page763229-
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neuroprotectants for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.pdf2.6 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.