Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103256
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEfficient subset simulation with active learning Kriging model for low failure probability prediction
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaodong
dc.contributor.authorQuek, Ser Tong
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T04:30:46Z
dc.date.available2022-07-14T04:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-01
dc.identifier.citationZhang, Xiaodong, Quek, Ser Tong (2022-04-01). Efficient subset simulation with active learning Kriging model for low failure probability prediction. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS 68. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103256
dc.identifier.issn0266-8920
dc.identifier.issn1878-4275
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228502
dc.description.abstractFor low failure probability prediction, subset simulation can reduce the number of simulations significantly compared to the traditional MCS method for a target prediction error limit. To further reduce the computational effort for cases where the performance function evaluation is tedious and time-consuming, the performance function is approximated by a sequentially updated (instead of a global) Kriging model. For this purpose, an active learning technique with a new learning and stopping criterion is employed to efficiently select points to train the computationally cheaper Kriging model at each simulation level, which is used to estimate the intermediate threshold and generate a new simulation sample. The updated Kriging model at the final subset simulation level is used to compute the conditional failure probability. The failure probability is estimated based on an initial simulation sample size N, and an updated N is computed and employed to obtain the final failure probability within a desired bound on the variability. The efficiency (in terms of the number of expensive evaluations using the actual performance function) and prediction error (represented by the mean square error (MSE)) of the proposed method are benchmarked using several examples. The method is shown to be more efficient (using lesser expensive evaluations) with smaller MSE for problems having low failure probabilities compared with selected existing methods.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectEngineering, Mechanical
dc.subjectMechanics
dc.subjectStatistics & Probability
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMathematics
dc.subjectActive learning
dc.subjectKriging model
dc.subjectSubset simulation
dc.subjectLow failure probability
dc.subjectRELIABILITY-ANALYSIS
dc.subjectNEURAL-NETWORKS
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-07-06T08:36:22Z
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103256
dc.description.sourcetitlePROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS
dc.description.volume68
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
PEM_ZhangXD_Preproof.pdfAccepted version2.23 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.