Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820968483
DC FieldValue
dc.titleWhere and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning
dc.contributor.authorImundo, Megan N
dc.contributor.authorPan, Steven C
dc.contributor.authorBjork, Elizabeth Ligon
dc.contributor.authorBjork, Robert A
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-13T03:00:59Z
dc.date.available2022-07-13T03:00:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.identifier.citationImundo, Megan N, Pan, Steven C, Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon, Bjork, Robert A (2021-03-01). Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 74 (3) : 413-424. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820968483
dc.identifier.issn1747-0218
dc.identifier.issn17470226
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228350
dc.description.abstractStudents are often advised to do all of their studying in one good place, but restudying to-be-learned material in a new context can enhance subsequent recall. We examined whether there are similar benefits for testing. In Experiment 1 (n = 106), participants studied a 36-word list and 48 hr later—when back in the same or a new context—either restudied or recalled the list without feedback. After another 48 hr, all participants free-recalled the list in a new context. Experiment 2 (n = 203) differed by having the testing-condition participants restudy the list before being tested. Across both experiments, testing in a new context reduced recall, which carried over to the final test, whereas restudying in a new context did not impair (and in Experiment 2, significantly enhanced) recall. These findings reveal critical interactions between contextual-variation and retrieval-practice effects, which we interpret as consistent with a distribution-of-memory-strengths framework.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectPsychology, Biological
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPsychology, Experimental
dc.subjectContext
dc.subjectcontextual variation
dc.subjectretrieval practice
dc.subjecttest-enhanced learning
dc.subjectbifurcation model
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
dc.subjectDEPENDENT MEMORY
dc.subjectTESTS
dc.subjectACQUISITION
dc.subjectRETENTION
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-07-11T07:19:18Z
dc.contributor.departmentPSYCHOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1177/1747021820968483
dc.description.sourcetitleQUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
dc.description.volume74
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page413-424
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
IPBB_2020.pdf3.89 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.