Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/covid2030030
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe Use of a Real-Time COVID-19 Standalone Device in an Emergency Department of a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore: A Pilot Observational Study
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Rhea
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ee Yang
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorKuan, Win Sen
dc.contributor.authorDaruwalla, Zubin Jimmy
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T08:31:37Z
dc.date.available2022-07-12T08:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-21
dc.identifier.citationJoshi, Rhea, Ng, Ee Yang, Singh, Rahul, Kuan, Win Sen, Daruwalla, Zubin Jimmy (2022-03-21). The Use of a Real-Time COVID-19 Standalone Device in an Emergency Department of a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore: A Pilot Observational Study. COVID 2 (3) : 419-432. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid2030030
dc.identifier.issn26738112
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/228309
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>This study describes the implementation and utility of a standalone device designed, developed, and 3D-printed by PwC Singapore and Southeast Asia Consulting as a response to Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in the Emergency Department (ED) of the National University Hospital in Singapore. Over a 2-week period, all staff used the devices for the duration of their shifts, with the device additionally tagged to patients who were swabbed on suspicion of or surveillance for COVID-19 in the subsequent two weeks. Additional control hardware was placed in the ED to analyze (1) time-intervals of greatest interaction, (2) clusters of close physical distance among staff, (3) areas with high traffic, and (4) potential use of a rapid contact tracing capability. Time-day trends indicated the greatest interaction time-intervals during the beginning of the day, with Monday hosting the greatest average daily interactions across the first two weeks. Social cluster trends indicated the greatest average daily interactions between nurses–nurses during Phase 1, and patients–patients during Phase 2. User-location trends revealed the greatest average daily interaction counts at the intermediate care areas, isolation outdoor tent, pantry, and isolation holding units relative to other areas. Individual-level visualization and contact tracing capabilities were not utilized as nobody contracted COVID-19 during either phase. While congregation in intermediate and resuscitation areas are unavoidable within the ED context, the findings of this study were acted upon, improving social distancing within the pantry and between healthcare groups. This real-time solution addresses multiple privacy concerns while rapidly facilitating contact tracing.</jats:p>
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-07-06T06:34:26Z
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.3390/covid2030030
dc.description.sourcetitleCOVID
dc.description.volume2
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page419-432
dc.published.statePublished online
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2022 Contra - COVID.pdfPublished version4.12 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.