Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Methods and global environmental governance | |
dc.contributor.author | Kate O’Neill | |
dc.contributor.author | ErikaWeinthal | |
dc.contributor.author | Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya | |
dc.contributor.author | Steven Bernstein | |
dc.contributor.author | Avery Cohn | |
dc.contributor.author | Michael W. Stone | |
dc.contributor.author | Benjamin Cashore | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-27T06:07:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-27T06:07:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kate O’Neill, ErikaWeinthal, Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya, Steven Bernstein, Avery Cohn, Michael W. Stone, Benjamin Cashore (2013-10-01). Methods and global environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38 : 441-471. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1543-5938 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1545-2050 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/227439 | |
dc.description.abstract | This review analyzes the methods being used and developed in global environmental governance (GEG), an applied field that employs insights and tools from a variety of disciplines both to understand pressing environmental problems and to determine how to address them collectively. We find that methods are often underspecified in GEG research.We undertake a critical review of data collection and analysis in three categories: qualitative, quantitative, and modeling and scenario building. We include examples and references from recent studies to show when and how best to utilize these different methods to conduct problem-driven research. GEG problems are often characterized by institutional and issue complexity, linkages, and multiscalarity that pose challenges for many conventional methodological approaches. As a result, given the large methodological toolbox available to applied researchers, we recommend they adopt a reflective, pluralist, and often collaborative approach when choosing methods appropriate to these challenges. | |
dc.subject | Global environmental governance | |
dc.subject | Problem-focused research | |
dc.subject | Complexity | |
dc.subject | Scale | |
dc.subject | Linkages | |
dc.subject | Methodological pluralism | |
dc.subject | Collaboration | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | DEAN'S OFFICE (LKY SCH OF PUBLIC POLICY) | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1146/annurev-environ-072811-114530 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Annual Review of Environment and Resources | |
dc.description.volume | 38 | |
dc.description.page | 441-471 | |
dc.published.state | Published | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methods and Global Environmental Governance.pdf | 381.98 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | None | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.