Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12602
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAn integrative literature review on midwives' perceptions on the facilitators and barriers of physiological birth
dc.contributor.authorWong, Cassandra YW
dc.contributor.authorHe, Hong-Gu
dc.contributor.authorShorey, Shefaly
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Serena SL
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T04:14:39Z
dc.date.available2022-06-10T04:14:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.identifier.citationWong, Cassandra YW, He, Hong-Gu, Shorey, Shefaly, Koh, Serena SL (2017-12-01). An integrative literature review on midwives' perceptions on the facilitators and barriers of physiological birth. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE 23 (6). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12602
dc.identifier.issn1322-7114
dc.identifier.issn1440-172X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/226898
dc.description.abstractAim: To present a synthesis and summary of midwives' perceptions on the facilitators and barriers of physiological birth. Background: Medicalisation of birth has transformed and dictated how birthing should take place since the 20th century. Midwives' perceptions on their role within this medicalised environment have not been well documented. Design: An integrative literature review. Data sources and review methods: Primary research articles published in English from the period of 2004 to 2015 were included in this review. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal forms were used to appraise the quality of the articles. Data were identified from CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. Results: Eighteen articles were reviewed. Lack of knowledge due to inadequate training, existing obstetrician-led practices, and midwives' negative perceptions of physiological birth were identified as barriers in the literature. Facilitators like shared decision-making, women's preferences, teamwork, institutional support, and midwives' positive perceptions of physiological birth promoted physiological birth. Most of the studies were conducted in Western countries. Conclusion: Midwives face barriers and facilitators when promoting physiological birth during their clinical practise. Future studies exploring midwives' perceptions of physiological birth are needed, especially in Asia where cultural and organizational factors may differ from Western countries.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectbarriers
dc.subjectfacilitators
dc.subjectliterature review
dc.subjectmidwives
dc.subjectnormal birth
dc.subjectphysiological birth
dc.subjectLABOR
dc.subjectEXPERIENCES
dc.subjectCHILDBIRTH
dc.subjectMIDWIFERY
dc.subjectWOMEN
dc.subject2ND-STAGE
dc.subjectPERSPECTIVE
dc.subjectSUPPORT
dc.subjectCARE
dc.typeReview
dc.date.updated2022-06-07T07:09:45Z
dc.contributor.departmentALICE LEE CENTRE FOR NURSING STUDIES
dc.description.doi10.1111/ijn.12602
dc.description.sourcetitleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE
dc.description.volume23
dc.description.issue6
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
wong et al 202017IJNP integrative revew MW perceptions.pdf320.98 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.