Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000321
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA Qualitative Study on Midwives' Perceptions of Physiologic Birth in Singapore
dc.contributor.authorWong, Cassandra Yuit Wah
dc.contributor.authorShorey, Shefaly
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorHe, Hong-Gu
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Serena SL
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T03:37:51Z
dc.date.available2022-06-10T03:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citationWong, Cassandra Yuit Wah, Shorey, Shefaly, Liew, Kelly, He, Hong-Gu, Koh, Serena SL (2018-10-01). A Qualitative Study on Midwives' Perceptions of Physiologic Birth in Singapore. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING 32 (4) : 315-323. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000321
dc.identifier.issn0893-2190
dc.identifier.issn1550-5073
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/226896
dc.description.abstractMidwives are advocates for parturients, and their actions and attitudes can influence a woman's experience during childbirth. Hence, it is valuable to examine midwives' perceptions of physiologic birth in an obstetric-led environment. A descriptive, qualitative study design was utilized. Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 registered midwives from the birthing suite of a public hospital in Singapore. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three major themes were (1) perceptions of physiologic birth, (2) perceived facilitators of physiologic birth, and (3) perceived barriers to physiologic birth. Interestingly, senior midwives in this study experienced more negative outcomes with physiologic birth, resulting in apprehension and reduced confidence levels. This study contributed to the understanding of midwives' perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to physiologic birth. Factors such as supporting birthing team and antepartum education could be useful in supporting physiologic birth. However, advanced age of some of the midwives was found in this study to be a barrier to physiologic birth.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectObstetrics & Gynecology
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectbarriers
dc.subjectfacilitators
dc.subjectmidwives
dc.subjectperception
dc.subjectphysiologic birth
dc.subjectMATERNITY CARE PROVIDERS
dc.subjectDECISION-MAKING
dc.subjectCHILDBIRTH
dc.subjectEXPERIENCES
dc.subjectLABOR
dc.subjectWOMEN
dc.subjectMIDWIFERY
dc.subjectSUPPORT
dc.subjectNURSES
dc.subjectPREGNANCY
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-06-07T07:09:08Z
dc.contributor.departmentALICE LEE CENTRE FOR NURSING STUDIES
dc.description.doi10.1097/JPN.0000000000000321
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page315-323
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Wong et al 2018 JPNN.pdf201.54 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.