PLANNING FOR A HETEROTOPIA : GEYLANG AND ITS UNIQUE MODE OF CONTROL

Abstract

Geylang is synonymous with both Singaporeans and tourists as a complicated and chaotic district in Singapore where only the brave should venture. Apart from the fact that it boasts a collection of buildings with a rich architectural heritage and a wide selection of gastronomic temptations, it is also one of the most active commercial sex scenes alive in Singapore. Despite being located on an unfancy street, free of iconic malls and chi-chi eateries and poseurs out brandishing their designer labels, Geylang still possess an inimitable charm that sets it apart from the rest of the homogeneous districts in Singapore. The juxtaposition of the old against the new, the ability to instil a sense of liberation and nostalgia and the chaotically ordered environment are just a few qualities of Geylang that contribute to its heterotopic nature. However, the image of Geylang has long been stained since the 1900s with the presence of illicit activities such as prostitution and illegal gambling, thus making it susceptible to urban and social issues that require a sophisticated injection of intervention to ensure a balance of vice and virtue. This thesis will attempt to explore this unique mode of control by first understanding its source, deciphering the mechanics of this hybrid methodology, and determining if it is appropriate for the future development of Geylang. With reference to Foucault’s thoughts on heterotopia and power, Geylang will first be theorized in order to recognize the significant forces in play. The next approach will be to draw attention to the factors behind the predetermined blemished beginning of Geylang, with resources such as articles from local and foreign newspapers, an interview with an urban planner from the Urban Redevelopment Authority and a survey conducted to determine Singaporeans’ impression and awareness of Geylang. Upon having a better understanding of the role of the vices in Geylang, I will then illustrate how Geylang functions as a tool of compression and emancipation while operating under its own terms by categorizing this territorial mode of governance into physical, economical and social control. With the underlying reasons and methods behind this alternate calibration being brought to light, we can then conclude if planning for the containment of Geylang is best for its future development and if so, to what extent should we advocate intervention in order for Geylang to flourish as a true city of “otherness”.