Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences
dc.contributor.authorNg, R.
dc.contributor.authorLevy, B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-19T04:19:36Z
dc.date.available2022-01-19T04:19:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationNg, R., Levy, B. (2018). Pettiness: Conceptualization, measurement and cross-cultural differences. PLoS ONE 13 (1) : e0191252. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191252
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/214074
dc.description.abstractAlthough pettiness, defined as the tendency to get agitated over trivial matters, is a facet of neuroticism which has negative health implications, no measure exists. The goal of the current study was to develop, and validate a short pettiness scale. In Study 1 (N = 2136), Exploratory Factor Analysis distilled a one-factor model with five items. Convergent validity was established using the Big Five Inventory, DASS, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale. As predicted, pettiness was positively associated with neuroticism, depression, anxiety and stress but negatively related to extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, life satisfaction and resilience. Also, as predicted, pettiness was not significantly related to physical functioning, or blind and constructive patriotism, indicating discriminant validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Study 2 (N = 734) revealed a stable one-factor model of pettiness. In Study 3 (N = 532), the scale, which showed a similar factor structure in the USA and Singapore, also reflected predicted cross-cultural patterns: Pettiness was found to be significantly lower in the United States, a culture categorized as 搇ooser� than in Singapore, a culture classified as 搕ighter� in terms of Gelfand and colleagues� framework of national tendencies to oppose social deviance. Results suggest that this brief 5-item tool is a reliable and valid measure of pettiness, and its use in health research is encouraged. � 2018 Ng, Levy. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0191252
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume13
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.pagee0191252
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0191252.pdf700.72 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons