Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S144483
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSatisfaction and convenience of using terpenoid-impregnated eyelid wipes and teaching method in people without blepharitis
dc.contributor.authorQiu, T.Y.
dc.contributor.authorYeo, S.
dc.contributor.authorTong, L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T05:51:58Z
dc.date.available2021-12-29T05:51:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationQiu, T.Y., Yeo, S., Tong, L. (2018). Satisfaction and convenience of using terpenoid-impregnated eyelid wipes and teaching method in people without blepharitis. Clinical Ophthalmology 12 : 91-98. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S144483
dc.identifier.issn1177-5467
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/212559
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Demodex infestations cause blepharitis and are difficult to treat. Recently, a new type of eyelid wipes with terpenoids has been found effective. We aim to evaluate patient satisfaction after short-term use and compare two teaching modalities on the techniques of use. Patients and methods: Eligible participants were taught to use eyelid wipes (Cliradex®) by either live or online video demonstration based on random allocation. Participants used the wipes twice daily for a week. All participants had prior evaluation of socioeconomic status, dry eye symptoms, and meibomian gland features. After 1 week, competence of use was assessed by participants showing their technique to the investigator, and a questionnaire on comfort, ease, and convenience of use was administered. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction, and these levels are compared among the two teaching modalities using chi square. Results: A total of 50 participants were recruited, with a mean age of 42±16 years, and 88% of the participants were females. Overall, median comfort level was 4.0 (range: 1–6), ease level was 5.0 (3–6), and convenience level was 5.0 (2–6). Median stinging was 2.0 (1–4), which corresponded to some but mild stinging. The median competence level was 4.0 (2–4), which corresponded to excellent competence. These satisfactory levels (ease, comfort, and convenience) experienced were not significantly associated with different socioeconomic indicators, that is, housing type, income, highest education level, and were not different between teaching methods (p>0.05). Conclusion: Short-term use of Cliradex eyelid wipes seems to be acceptable to most people. The teaching instructions before using these wipes were equally effective – whether live or online video demonstration was used. © 2018 Qiu et al.
dc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.subjectBlepharitis
dc.subjectDemodex
dc.subjectDry eye
dc.subjectEyelid wipes
dc.subjectMeibomian gland dysfunction
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.2147/OPTH.S144483
dc.description.sourcetitleClinical Ophthalmology
dc.description.volume12
dc.description.page91-98
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_2147_OPTH_S144483.pdf455.16 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons