Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.002
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePseudo-static/dynamic solutions of required reinforcement force for steep slopes using discretization-based kinematic analysis
dc.contributor.authorQin, C.
dc.contributor.authorChian, S.C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T05:45:15Z
dc.date.available2021-12-29T05:45:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationQin, C., Chian, S.C. (2019). Pseudo-static/dynamic solutions of required reinforcement force for steep slopes using discretization-based kinematic analysis. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 11 (2) : 289-299. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.002
dc.identifier.issn1674-7755
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/212472
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a procedure for assessing the reinforcement force of geosynthetics required for maintaining dynamic stability of a steep soil slope. Such a procedure is achieved with the use of the discretization technique and kinematic analysis of plasticity theory, i.e. discretization-based kinematic analysis. The discretization technique allows discretization of the analyzed slope into various components and generation of a kinematically admissible failure mechanism based on an associated flow rule. Accordingly, variations in soil properties including soil cohesion, internal friction angle and unit weight are accounted for with ease, while the conventional kinematic analysis fails to consider the changes in soil properties. The spatial–temporal effects of dynamic accelerations represented by primary and shear seismic waves are considered using the pseudo-dynamic approach. In the presence of geosynthetic reinforcement, tensile failure is discussed providing that the geosynthetics are installed with sufficient length. Equating the total rates of work done by external forces to the internal rates of work yields the upper bound solution of required reinforcement force, below which slopes fail. The reinforcement force is sought by optimizing the objective function with regard to independent variables, and presented in a normalized form. Pseudo-static analysis is a special case and hence readily transformed from pseudo-dynamic analysis. Comparisons of the pseudo-static/dynamic solutions calculated in this study are highlighted. Although the pseudo-static approach yields a conservative solution, its ability to give a reasonable result is substantiated for steep slopes. In order to provide a more meaningful solution to a stability analysis, the pseudo-dynamic approach is recommended due to considerations of spatial–temporal effect of earthquake input. © 2019 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
dc.publisherChinese Academy of Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectDiscretization technique
dc.subjectDiscretization-based kinematic analysis
dc.subjectGeosynthetics
dc.subjectPseudo-static/dynamic approach
dc.subjectReinforced soil
dc.subjectSeismic stability
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.002
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page289-299
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1016_j_jrmge_2018_10_002.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons