Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJR-2018-0096.R1
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAutologous bone marrow clot as an alternative to autograft for bone defect healing
dc.contributor.authorLim, Z.X.H.
dc.contributor.authorRai, B.
dc.contributor.authorTan, T.C.
dc.contributor.authorRamruttun, A.K.
dc.contributor.authorHui, J.H.
dc.contributor.authorNurcombe, V.
dc.contributor.authorTeoh, S.H.
dc.contributor.authorCool, S.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T04:36:37Z
dc.date.available2021-12-29T04:36:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLim, Z.X.H., Rai, B., Tan, T.C., Ramruttun, A.K., Hui, J.H., Nurcombe, V., Teoh, S.H., Cool, S.M. (2019). Autologous bone marrow clot as an alternative to autograft for bone defect healing. Bone and Joint Research 8 (3) : 107-117. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJR-2018-0096.R1
dc.identifier.issn20463758
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/212321
dc.description.abstractObjectives Long bone defects often require surgical intervention for functional restoration. The 'gold standard' treatment is autologous bone graft (ABG), usually from the patient's iliac crest. However, autograft is plagued by complications including limited supply, donor site morbidity, and the need for an additional surgery. Thus, alternative therapies are being actively investigated. Autologous bone marrow (BM) is considered as a candidate due to the presence of both endogenous reparative cells and growth factors. We aimed to compare the therapeutic potentials of autologous bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and ABG, which has not previously been done. Methods We compared the efficacy of coagulated autologous BMA and ABG for the repair of ulnar defects in New Zealand White rabbits. Segmental defects (14 mm) were filled with autologous clotted BM or morcellized autograft, and healing was assessed four and 12 weeks postoperatively. Harvested ulnas were subjected to radiological, micro-CT, histological, and mechanical analyses. Results Comparable results were obtained with autologous BMA clot and ABG, except for the quantification of new bone by micro-CT. Significantly more bone was found in the ABG-treated ulnar defects than in those treated with autologous BMA clot. This is possibly due to the remnants of necrotic autograft fragments that persisted within the healing defects at week 12 post-surgery. Conclusion As similar treatment outcomes were achieved by the two strategies, the preferred treatment would be one that is associated with a lower risk of complications. Hence, these results demonstrate that coagulated BMA can be considered as an alternative autogenous therapy for long bone healing. 2019 © British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. All Rights Reserved.
dc.publisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectAutologous bone graft
dc.subjectBone mineralization
dc.subjectBone repair
dc.subjectCoagulated autologous bone marrow aspirate
dc.subjectDefect healing
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
dc.description.doi10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJR-2018-0096.R1
dc.description.sourcetitleBone and Joint Research
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page107-117
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1302_2046-3758_83_BJR-2018-0096_R1.pdf1.97 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons