Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25963
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIMI – Industry guidelines and ethical considerations for Myopia control report
dc.contributor.authorJones, L.
dc.contributor.authorDrobe, B.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Méijome, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorGray, L.
dc.contributor.authorKratzer, T.
dc.contributor.authorNewman, S.
dc.contributor.authorNichols, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorOhlendorf, A.
dc.contributor.authorRamdass, S.
dc.contributor.authorSantodomingo-Rubido, J.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorTan, D.
dc.contributor.authorTan, K.-O.
dc.contributor.authorVera-Diaz, F.A.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Y.-L.
dc.contributor.authorGifford, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorResnikoff, S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T10:02:05Z
dc.date.available2021-12-28T10:02:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJones, L., Drobe, B., González-Méijome, J.M., Gray, L., Kratzer, T., Newman, S., Nichols, J.J., Ohlendorf, A., Ramdass, S., Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Schmid, K.L., Tan, D., Tan, K.-O., Vera-Diaz, F.A., Wong, Y.-L., Gifford, K.L., Resnikoff, S. (2019). IMI – Industry guidelines and ethical considerations for Myopia control report. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 60 : M161-M183. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25963
dc.identifier.issn0146-0404
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/212115
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. To discuss guidelines and ethical considerations associated with the development and prescription of treatments intended for myopia control (MC). METHODS. Critical review of published papers and guidance documents was undertaken, with a view to carefully considering the ethical standards associated with the investigation, development, registration, marketing, prescription, and use of MC treatments. RESULTS. The roles and responsibilities of regulatory bodies, manufacturers, academics, eye care practitioners, and patients in the use of MC treatments are explored. Particular attention is given to the ethical considerations for deciding whether to implement a MC strategy and how to implement this within a clinical trial or practice setting. Finally, the responsibilities in marketing, support, and education required to transfer required knowledge and skills to eye care practitioners and academics are discussed. CONCLUSIONS. Undertaking MC treatment in minors creates an ethical challenge for a wide variety of stakeholders. Regulatory bodies, manufacturers, academics, and clinicians all share an ethical responsibility to ensure that the products used for MC are safe and efficacious and that patients understand the benefits and potential risks of such products. This International Myopia Institute report highlights these ethical challenges and provides stakeholders with recommendations and guidelines in the development, financial support, prescribing, and advertising of such treatments. Copyright 2019 The Authors.
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectConflict of interest
dc.subjectEthical prescribing
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectMedical device
dc.subjectMyopia control
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentUNIVERSITY SCHOLARS PROGRAMME
dc.description.doi10.1167/iovs.18-25963
dc.description.sourcetitleInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
dc.description.volume60
dc.description.pageM161-M183
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1167_iovs_18-25963.pdf981.99 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons