Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.712
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe learning environment of four undergraduate health professional schools: Lessons learned
dc.contributor.authorIrfan, F.
dc.contributor.authorAl Faris, E.
dc.contributor.authorAl Maflehi, N.
dc.contributor.authorKarim, S.I.
dc.contributor.authorPonnamperuma, G.
dc.contributor.authorSaad, H.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, A.M.A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-16T07:49:41Z
dc.date.available2021-12-16T07:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationIrfan, F., Al Faris, E., Al Maflehi, N., Karim, S.I., Ponnamperuma, G., Saad, H., Ahmed, A.M.A. (2019). The learning environment of four undergraduate health professional schools: Lessons learned. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 35 (3) : 598-604. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.712
dc.identifier.issn1682024X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/210780
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Learning is an interplay between cognition and environmental factors. Any learning environment, that fulfills the intrinsic and extrinsic needs of the students will probably lead to better and more promising learning outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the student perceptions of Learning Environment (LE) in four health schools of a large university and compare between schools, years of study, and gender. Methods: Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire and a socio-demographic questionnaire were completed by 1185 undergraduate students enrolled in the school of Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and Applied Medical Sciences (AMS) of a large university during the academic year 2012-2013. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Independent student t-test or ANOVA (with Tukey post-hoc test) was used for continuous variables at a significance level of p≤0.05. Results: The mean total DREEM score was 89.23±33.3. The total DREEM mean scores for Dentistry (120.54±23.45) and Medicine (110.72±19.33) were higher compared with AMS (63.48±21.36) and Nursing (57.48±22.80) (p=0.000) (Post hoc Tukey p=0.000). First year students gave significantly higher positive perceptions ratings than the rest of the years (p=0.000). Total scores were significantly higher for male (92.78±33.86) than female students (84.70±32.25) p=0.000. Conclusion: The LE significantly differed by year and gender. The students from non-integrated curricula (nursing and AMS) perceived the LE less positively than their integrated curriculum counterparts (medicine and dentistry). A qualitative study is needed to investigate the variation in the perception of LE among these groups. © 2019, Professional Medical Publications. All rights reserved.
dc.publisherProfessional Medical Publications
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2019
dc.subjectCurriculum
dc.subjectDREEM
dc.subjectHealth professional students
dc.subjectLearning environment
dc.subjectStudent perceptions
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (MEDICINE)
dc.description.doi10.12669/pjms.35.3.712
dc.description.sourcetitlePakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.description.volume35
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page598-604
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_12669_pjms_35_3_712.pdf334.03 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons