Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM-452-16
DC FieldValue
dc.titleFactors associated with reintubation in an intensive care unit: A prospective observational study
dc.contributor.authorLee, ESH
dc.contributor.authorLIM TSE JIANN DANNY
dc.contributor.authorTaculod, JM
dc.contributor.authorSahagun, JT
dc.contributor.authorOtero, JP
dc.contributor.authorTeo, K
dc.contributor.authorLoh, WNH
dc.contributor.authorTAN YONG HUI ADDY
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T00:49:44Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30T00:49:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.identifier.citationLee, ESH, LIM TSE JIANN DANNY, Taculod, JM, Sahagun, JT, Otero, JP, Teo, K, Loh, WNH, TAN YONG HUI ADDY (2017-03-01). Factors associated with reintubation in an intensive care unit: A prospective observational study. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine 21 (3) : 131-137. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM-452-16
dc.identifier.issn0972-5229
dc.identifier.issn1998-359X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/208667
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of failed extubations in our Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and identify associated clinical factors. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study of mechanically ventilated patients who underwent extubation attempts in our (predominantly surgical) ICU was undertaken from July 2012 to August 2013. The primary endpoint was the need for nonelective reintubation within 72 h of extubation. Clinical data of the reintubated patients were compared with those who were successfully extubated to identify factors associated with reintubation. Results: Five hundred and eight extubation attempts were documented, 38 (7.5%) of which were unsuccessful. On multivariate analysis, the following clinical factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of failed extubation: unplanned extubations (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.8), the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) postextubation (adjusted OR 3.2), and sepsis (adjusted OR 2.9). Patient demographic factors, other premorbid and comorbid medical conditions, and differences of laboratory parameters did not appear to significantly influence reintubation rates in our study. Conclusions: Our study has demonstrated a relatively low reintubation rate, likely due to inclusion of elective admissions/intubations in our patient population. Unplanned extubations, the use of NIV postextubation, and sepsis were associated with increased reintubation risk, reinforcing the need for increased vigilance in this subgroup of patients after extubation.
dc.publisherMedknow Publications
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-11-29T08:44:04Z
dc.contributor.departmentANAESTHESIA
dc.description.doi10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM-452-16
dc.description.sourcetitleIndian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page131-137
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
ijccm.IJCCM_452_16.pdf270.13 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.