Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009460
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAssociation between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Z.-L.
dc.contributor.authorWang, J.-Y.
dc.contributor.authorGong, L.-L.
dc.contributor.authorGan, S.
dc.contributor.authorGu, C.-M.
dc.contributor.authorWang, S.-S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T03:20:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-17T03:20:39Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGuo, Z.-L., Wang, J.-Y., Gong, L.-L., Gan, S., Gu, C.-M., Wang, S.-S. (2018). Association between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk. Medicine (United States) 97 (1) : 9460. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009460
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/206547
dc.description.abstractBackground: We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether a consistent relationship exists between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis in humans. Accordingly, we summarized and reviewed previously published quantitative studies. Methods: Eligible studies with reference lists published before June 1, 2017 were obtained from searching several databases. Random effects models were used to summary the overall estimate of the multivariate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Six observational studies involving 88,045 participants were identified and stratified into the following categories according to cadmium assessment results: occupational (n = 4) and dietary (n = 2). The findings of the meta-analysis suggested that the risk of urolithiasis increases significantly by 1.32 times at higher cadmium exposure (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.08-1.62; for highest vs lowest category urinary cadmium values). The summary OR in occupational exposure (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.13-2.14) increased at the same condition. Meanwhile, no association was observed between cadmium exposure and urolithiasis risk in dietary exposure (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 0.87-1.47). A significant association remained consistent, as indicated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: The meta-analysis indicated that increased risk of urolithiasis is associated with high cadmium exposure, and this association is higher in occupational exposure than in dietary exposure. Nevertheless, well-designed observational studies with different ethnic populations are still needed. Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2018
dc.subjectcadmium
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecturolithiasis
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000009460
dc.description.sourcetitleMedicine (United States)
dc.description.volume97
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page9460
Appears in Collections:Students Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1097_MD_0000000000009460.pdf453.47 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons