Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2018.10.004
DC FieldValue
dc.titleVaccine programme stakeholder perspectives on a hypothetical single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine schedule in low and middle-income countries
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, KE
dc.contributor.authorKelly, H
dc.contributor.authorCocks, N
dc.contributor.authorDixon, S
dc.contributor.authorMounier-Jack, S
dc.contributor.authorHoward, N
dc.contributor.authorWatson-Jones, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T03:12:19Z
dc.date.available2021-11-02T03:12:19Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.identifier.citationGallagher, KE, Kelly, H, Cocks, N, Dixon, S, Mounier-Jack, S, Howard, N, Watson-Jones, D (2018-12-01). Vaccine programme stakeholder perspectives on a hypothetical single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine schedule in low and middle-income countries. Papillomavirus Research 6 : 33-40. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2018.10.004
dc.identifier.issn24058521
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/205361
dc.description.abstractBackground: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 2-dose HPV vaccine schedule for girls aged 9–14 years. As randomised controlled trials assessing the immunogenicity and efficacy of a 1-dose schedule are ongoing, we interviewed immunisation programme managers and advisors in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) about a hypothetical, future reduction in the HPV vaccine schedule. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with LMIC immunisation programme managers and national immunisation technical advisory group members (key informants; KIs) in 2017, recruited for their knowledge/experience in national HPV vaccine policy and provision. Data were analysed thematically. Results: We conducted 30 interviews with KIs from 18 countries. Perceived advantages of a 1-dose schedule included reduced logistical and financial resources needed for vaccine delivery, fewer cold chain requirements and easier integration into routine immunisation services. Perceived challenges included health worker hesitancy, resources needed to re-mobilise communities and re-train health workers, potential misrepresentation of schedule changes by anti-vaccine groups or the media. Half of interviewees suggested a WHO recommendation would be necessary prior to policy change. Conclusions: We found wide-ranging support among LMIC immunisation managers and advisors for a 1-dose vaccine schedule if research demonstrated immunological and clinical evidence of efficacy, and WHO provided a formal recommendation.
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectAcceptability
dc.subjectHPV vaccine/vaccination
dc.subjectLow and middle income countries
dc.subjectPerspectives
dc.subjectSchedule
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-10-30T09:41:52Z
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.pvr.2018.10.004
dc.description.sourcetitlePapillomavirus Research
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page33-40
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Vaccine programme stakeholder perspectives on a hypothetical single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine schedule in low .pdfPublished version497.91 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.