Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.059
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNONINVASIVE VENTILATION AS A TEMPORIZING MEASURE IN CRITICAL FIXED CENTRAL AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION: A CASE REPORT
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Lenard Tai Win
dc.contributor.authorTIONG BENG SIM
dc.contributor.authorKuan, Win Sen
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T09:59:29Z
dc.date.available2021-10-05T09:59:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01
dc.identifier.citationCheng, Lenard Tai Win, TIONG BENG SIM, Kuan, Win Sen (2018-05-01). NONINVASIVE VENTILATION AS A TEMPORIZING MEASURE IN CRITICAL FIXED CENTRAL AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION: A CASE REPORT. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 54 (5) : 615-618. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.059
dc.identifier.issn0736-4679
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/201990
dc.description.abstractBackground: Critical central airway obstruction (CAO) requires emergent airway intervention, but current guidelines lack specific recommendations for airway management in the emergency department (ED) while awaiting rigid bronchoscopy. There are few reports of the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in tracheomalacia, but its use as a temporizing treatment option in fixed, malignant CAO has not, to the best of our knowledge, been reported. Case Report: An 84-year-old woman presented to the ED in respiratory distress, too breathless to speak and using her accessory muscles of respiration, with bilateral rhonchi throughout the lung fields. Point-of-care arterial blood gas revealed severe hypercapnia, and NIV was initiated to treat a presumed bronchitis with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Chest radiography revealed a paratracheal mass with tracheal deviation and compression. A diagnosis of critical CAO was made. While arranging for rigid bronchoscopic stenting, the patient was kept on NIV to good effect. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This?: Recommendations for emergent treatment of life-threatening, critical CAO before bronchoscopic intervention are not well established. Furthermore, reports of NIV use in CAO are rare. We suggest that emergency physicians consider NIV as a temporizing measure for critical CAO while awaiting availability of bronchoscopy.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectcentral airway obstruction
dc.subjectnoninvasive ventilation
dc.subjectQUALITY-OF-LIFE
dc.subjectTHERAPEUTIC BRONCHOSCOPY
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectINTUBATION
dc.subjectPRESSURE
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-10-05T03:42:16Z
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.059
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
dc.description.volume54
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page615-618
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2018 NIV in CAO - JEM.pdfPublished version4.05 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.