Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020431
DC FieldValue
dc.titleVirtual reality mobile application to improve videoscopic airway training: A randomised trial
dc.contributor.authorYau, Ying Wei
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zisheng
dc.contributor.authorChua, Mui Teng
dc.contributor.authorSen Kuan, Win
dc.contributor.authorChan, Gene Wai Han
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T06:01:39Z
dc.date.available2021-10-05T06:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.identifier.citationYau, Ying Wei, Li, Zisheng, Chua, Mui Teng, Sen Kuan, Win, Chan, Gene Wai Han (2021-02-01). Virtual reality mobile application to improve videoscopic airway training: A randomised trial. ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE 50 (2). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020431
dc.identifier.issn03044602
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/201929
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Flexible bronchoscopic intubation (FBI) is an important technique in managing an anticipated difficult airway, yet it is rarely performed and has a steep learning curve. We aim to evaluate if the integration of virtual reality gaming application into routine FBI training for emergency department doctors would be more effective than traditional teaching methods. METHODS: We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare self-directed learning using the mobile application, Airway Ex* in the intervention group versus the control group without use of the mobile application. All participants underwent conventional didactic teaching and low-fidelity simulation with trainer's demonstration and hands-on practice on a manikin for FBI. Participants randomised to the intervention arm received an additional 30 minutes of self-directed learning using Airway Ex, preloaded on electronic devices while the control arm did not. The primary outcome was time taken to successful intubation. RESULTS: Forty-five physicians (20 junior and 25 senior physicians) were enrolled, with male predominance (57.8%, 26/45). There was no difference in time taken to successful intubation (median 48 seconds [interquartile range, IQR 41-69] versus 44 seconds [IQR 37-60], P=0.23) between the control and intervention groups, respectively. However, the intervention group received better ratings (median 4 [IQR 4-5]) for the quality of scope manipulation skills compared to control (median 4 [IQR 3-4], adjusted P=0.03). This difference remains significant among junior physicians in stratified analysis. CONCLUSION: Incorporating virtual reality with traditional teaching methods allows learners to be trained on FBI safely without compromising patient care. Junior physicians appear to benefit more compared to senior physicians.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherACAD MEDICINE SINGAPORE
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.subjectAirway management
dc.subjectemergency medicine
dc.subjectintubation
dc.subjectsimulation education
dc.subjectvirtual reality
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-10-05T02:55:58Z
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020431
dc.description.sourcetitleANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE
dc.description.volume50
dc.description.issue2
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2021 AURA - AAMS.pdfPublished version1.14 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.