Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112073
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUs policy uncertainty and stock market nexus revisited through dynamic ardl simulation and threshold modelling
dc.contributor.authorKhan, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, M.
dc.contributor.authorPopp, J.
dc.contributor.authorOláh, J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-26T07:31:18Z
dc.date.available2021-08-26T07:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKhan, M.A., Ahmed, M., Popp, J., Oláh, J. (2020). Us policy uncertainty and stock market nexus revisited through dynamic ardl simulation and threshold modelling. Mathematics 8 (11) : 1-20. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112073
dc.identifier.issn2227-7390
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/199541
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of the measure of economic policy uncertainty, businesses, policymakers, and academic scholars closely monitor its momentum due to expected economic implications. The US is the world’s top-ranked equity market by size, and prior literature on policy uncertainty and stock prices for the US is conflicting. In this study, we reexamine the policy uncertainty and stock price nexus from the US perspective, using a novel dynamically simulated autoregressive distributed lag setting introduced in 2018, which appears superior to traditional models. The empirical findings document a negative response of stock prices to 10% positive/negative shock in policy uncertainty in the short-run, while in the long-run, an increase in policy uncertainty by 10% reduces the stock prices, which increases in response to a decrease with the same magnitude. Moreover, we empirically identified two significant thresholds: (1) policy score of 4.89 (original score 132.39), which negatively explain stock prices with high magnitude, and (2) policy score 4.48 (original score 87.98), which explains stock prices negatively with a relatively low magnitude, and interestingly, policy changes below the second threshold become irrelevant to explain stock prices in the United States. It is worth noting that all indices are not equally exposed to unfavorable policy changes. The overall findings are robust to the alternative measures of policy uncertainty and stock prices and offer useful policy input. The limitations of the study and future line of research are also highlighted. All in all, the policy uncertainty is an indicator that shall remain ever-important due to its nature and implication on the various sectors of the economy (the equity market in particular). © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectDynamically simulated autoregressive distributed lag (DYS-ARDL)
dc.subjectPolicy uncertainty
dc.subjectStock prices
dc.subjectThreshold regression
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.3390/math8112073
dc.description.sourcetitleMathematics
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page1-20
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_math8112073.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons