Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02296-x
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInterprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review
dc.contributor.authorBok, C.
dc.contributor.authorNg, C.H.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, J.W.H.
dc.contributor.authorOng, Z.H.
dc.contributor.authorGhazali, H.Z.B.
dc.contributor.authorTan, L.H.E.
dc.contributor.authorOng, Y.T.
dc.contributor.authorCheong, C.W.S.
dc.contributor.authorChin, A.M.C.
dc.contributor.authorMason, S.
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, L.K.R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T02:41:36Z
dc.date.available2021-08-24T02:41:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBok, C., Ng, C.H., Koh, J.W.H., Ong, Z.H., Ghazali, H.Z.B., Tan, L.H.E., Ong, Y.T., Cheong, C.W.S., Chin, A.M.C., Mason, S., Krishna, L.K.R. (2020). Interprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education 20 (1) : 372. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02296-x
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/198998
dc.description.abstractBackground: Effective Interprofessional Communication (IPC) between healthcare professionals enhances teamwork and improves patient care. Yet IPC training remains poorly structured in medical schools. To address this gap, a scoping review is proposed to study current IPC training approaches in medical schools. Methods: Krishna’s Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) was used to guide a scoping review of IPC training for medical students published between 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018 in PubMed, ScienceDirect, JSTOR, Google Scholar, ERIC, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO. The data accrued was independently analysed using thematic and content analysis to enhance the reproducibility and transparency of this SEBA guided review. Results: 17,809 titles and abstracts were found, 250 full-text articles were reviewed and 73 full text articles were included. Directed Content analysis revealed 4 categories corresponding to the levels of the Miller’s Pyramid whilst thematic analysis revealed 5 themes including the indications, stages of trainings and evaluations, content, challenges and outcomes of IPC training. Many longitudinal programs were designed around the levels of Miller’s Pyramid. Conclusion: IPC training is a stage-wise, competency-based learning process that pivots on a learner-centric spiralled curriculum. Progress from one stage to the next requires attainment of the particular competencies within each stage of the training process. Whilst further studies into the dynamics of IPC interactions, assessment methods and structuring of these programs are required, we forward an evidenced based framework to guide design of future IPC programs. © 2020, The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectCommunications skills
dc.subjectInterprofessional communication
dc.subjectMedical education
dc.subjectMedical students
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectUndergraduate medical training
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentNUS LIBRARIES
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12909-020-02296-x
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Medical Education
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page372
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12909_020_02296_x.pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons