Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12699
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePassive immune therapy and other immunomodulatory agents for the treatment of severe influenza: Systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.authorLim, V.W.
dc.contributor.authorTudor Car, L.
dc.contributor.authorLeo, Y.-S.
dc.contributor.authorChen, M.I.-C.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, B.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T02:37:24Z
dc.date.available2021-08-24T02:37:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationLim, V.W., Tudor Car, L., Leo, Y.-S., Chen, M.I.-C., Young, B. (2020). Passive immune therapy and other immunomodulatory agents for the treatment of severe influenza: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses 14 (2) : 226-236. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12699
dc.identifier.issn1750-2640
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/198939
dc.description.abstractBackground: A range of immunomodulatory therapies have been proposed as adjuncts to conventional antivirals to suppress harmful inflammation during severe influenza infection. We conducted a systematic review to assess available data of the effect of adjunctive non-corticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy and potential adverse effects. Method: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and clinical trial databases for published and unpublished studies, and screened the references of included articles. We included RCTs, quasi-RCTs and observational studies of virologically confirmed influenza infections in hospitalised patients. We did not restrict studies by language of publication, influenza type/subtype or age of participants. Where possible, we pooled estimates of effect using random-effects meta-analysis models. Results: We identified 11 eligible studies for inclusion: five studies (4 RCTs and 1 observational; 693 individuals) of passive immune therapy; four studies (3 RCTs and 1 observational; 1120 individuals) of macrolides and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), one RCT of mTOR inhibitors (38 individuals), and one RCT of statin therapy (116 individuals). Meta-analysis of RCTs of passive immune therapy indicated no significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.84, 0.37-1.90), but better clinical outcomes at Day 7 (OR 1.42, 1.05-1.92). There was a significant reduction in mortality associated with macrolides and/or NSAIDs (OR 0.28; 0.10-0.77). Conclusions: Passive immune therapy is unlikely to offer substantial mortality benefit in treatment of severe seasonal influenza, but may improve clinical outcomes. The effect of other immunomodulatory agents is uncertain, but promising. There is a need for high-quality RCTs with sufficient statistical power to address this evidence gap. @ 2019 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectadjunctive therapies
dc.subjectinfluenza
dc.subjectmortality
dc.subjectpassive immune therapy
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1111/irv.12699
dc.description.sourcetitleInfluenza and other Respiratory Viruses
dc.description.volume14
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page226-236
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1111_irv_12699.pdf646.9 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons