Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00566-3
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe north-south policy divide in transnational healthcare: A comparative review of policy research on medical tourism in source and destination countries
dc.contributor.authorVirani, A.
dc.contributor.authorWellstead, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorHowlett, M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T09:08:19Z
dc.date.available2021-08-23T09:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationVirani, A., Wellstead, A.M., Howlett, M. (2020). The north-south policy divide in transnational healthcare: A comparative review of policy research on medical tourism in source and destination countries. Globalization and Health 16 (1) : 37. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00566-3
dc.identifier.issn17448603
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/198832
dc.description.abstractMedical tourism occupies different spaces within national policy frameworks depending on which side of the transnational paradigm countries belong to, and how they seek to leverage it towards their developmental goals. This article draws attention to this policy divide in transnational healthcare through a comparative bibliometric review of policy research on medical tourism in select source (Canada, United States and United Kingdom) and destination countries (Mexico, India, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore), using a systematic search of the Web of Science (WoS) database and review of grey literature. We assess cross-national differences in policy and policy research on medical tourism against contextual policy landscapes and challenges, and examine the convergence between research and policy. Our findings indicate major disparities in development agendas and national policy concerns, both between and among source and destination countries. Further, we find that research on medical tourism does not always address prevailing policy challenges, just as the policy discourse oftentimes neglects relevant policy research on the subject. Based on our review, we highlight the limited application of theoretical policy paradigms in current medical tourism research and make the case for a comparative policy research agenda for the field. @ 2020 The Author(s).
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectBibliometric analysis
dc.subjectComparative review
dc.subjectMedical tourism
dc.subjectNorth-south divide
dc.subjectPolicy research
dc.subjectResearch-policy gap
dc.subjectTransnational healthcare
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12992-020-00566-3
dc.description.sourcetitleGlobalization and Health
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page37
Appears in Collections:Students Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12992_020_00566_3.pdf1.72 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons