Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124462
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIdentifying who improves or maintains their food literacy behaviours after completing an adult program
dc.contributor.authorBegley, A.
dc.contributor.authorPaynter, E.
dc.contributor.authorButcher, L.
dc.contributor.authorBobongie, V.
dc.contributor.authorDhaliwal, S.S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T03:26:33Z
dc.date.available2021-08-23T03:26:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-21
dc.identifier.citationBegley, A., Paynter, E., Butcher, L., Bobongie, V., Dhaliwal, S.S. (2020-06-21). Identifying who improves or maintains their food literacy behaviours after completing an adult program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (12) : 1-13. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124462
dc.identifier.issn16617827
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/198792
dc.description.abstractFood Sensations for Adults is a free four-week nutrition and cooking program that teaches low-to middle-income individuals food literacy. This research aimed to compare demographic characteristics of participants who completed the program’s follow-up questionnaire three months after program completion and assess whether food literacy and dietary behaviour changes were improved or maintained. Statistical analysis methods used factor scores of the plan and manage, selection, and preparation domains to examine mean self-reported changes in food literacy. Tertile stratification methods calculated changes in participants who had low, middle, and high end-of-program food literacy scores, and multivariable regression analysis explored the associations. The follow-up results (n = 621) demonstrated a statistically significant factor score increase in plan and manage (3%) and selection (7.2%) domain scores, and a decrease in the preparation score (3.1%), and serves of consumed vegetables (7.9%), but were still significantly higher than at the start of the program. At follow-up, participants with low food literacy at the program end significantly improved their follow-up domain scores for plan and manage (60%) and selection (73.3%), and participants with moderate or high food literacy at the program end maintained their follow-up scores. A food literacy program can support adults to improve and maintain their food literacy behaviours and maintain dietary behaviour change; therefore, strategies to support this continued change must be considered. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectBehaviour change
dc.subjectDiet
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectFood literacy
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.3390/ijerph17124462
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.description.volume17
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page1-13
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_ijerph17124462.pdf321.81 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons