Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S275496
DC FieldValue
dc.titleScenarios to manage the demand for N95 respirators for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y.
dc.contributor.authorOtomaru, H.
dc.contributor.authorQuaye, S.E.D.
dc.contributor.authorSomani, J.
dc.contributor.authorBagdasarian, N.
dc.contributor.authorBeh, D.L.L.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorCook, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorDickens, B.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T08:45:53Z
dc.date.available2021-08-17T08:45:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSun, Y., Otomaru, H., Quaye, S.E.D., Somani, J., Bagdasarian, N., Beh, D.L.L., Fisher, D.A., Cook, A.R., Dickens, B.L. (2020). Scenarios to manage the demand for N95 respirators for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 13 : 2489-2496. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S275496
dc.identifier.issn11791594
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/197331
dc.description.abstractBackground: By estimating N95 respirator demand based on simulated epidemics, we aim to assist planning efforts requiring estimations of respirator demand for the healthcare system to continue operating safely in the coming months. Methods: We assess respiratory needs over the course of mild, moderate and severe epidemic scenarios within Singapore as a case study using a transmission dynamic model. The number of respirators required within the respiratory isolation wards and intensive care units was estimated over the course of the epidemic. We also considered single-use, extended-use and prolonged-use strategies for N95 respirators for use by healthcare workers treating suspected but negative (misclassified) or confirmed COVID-19 patients. Results: Depending on the confirmed to misclassified case ratio, from 1:0 to 1:10, a range of 117.1 million to 1.1 billion masks are required for single-use. This decreases to 71.6–784.4 million for extended-use and 12.8–148.2 million for prolonged-use, representing a 31.8–38.9% and 86.5–89.1% reduction, respectively. Conclusion: An extended-use policy should be considered when short-term supply chains are strained but planning measures are in place to ensure long-term availability. With severe shortage expectations from a severe epidemic, as some European countries have experienced, prolonged use is necessary to prolong supply. © 2020 Sun et al.
dc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltd
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemic
dc.subjectHealthcare resources
dc.subjectMathematical modelling
dc.subjectN95 respirators
dc.subjectPolicy
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.2147/RMHP.S275496
dc.description.sourcetitleRisk Management and Healthcare Policy
dc.description.volume13
dc.description.page2489-2496
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_2147_RMHP_S275496.pdf2.25 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons