Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.008
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAn evaluation of illness, treatment perceptions, and depression in hospital- vs. home-based dialysis modalities
dc.contributor.authorGriva, K.
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, M.
dc.contributor.authorNewman, S.
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, A.
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-23T04:48:31Z
dc.date.available2011-02-23T04:48:31Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationGriva, K., Harrison, M., Newman, S., Davenport, A. (2010). An evaluation of illness, treatment perceptions, and depression in hospital- vs. home-based dialysis modalities. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 69 (4) : 363-370. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.008
dc.identifier.issn00223999
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/19621
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Depressive symptoms are common among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In order to better understand what factors influence these symptoms, we examined the impact of illness and treatment cognitions on emotional adjustment and the influence of dialysis modality (hospital- vs. home-based dialysis) on this relationship. Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 145 ESRD patients on four different dialysis modalities [hospital hemodialysis (HD), n=52; home HD, n=25; continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), n=45; automated PD (APD), n=23] completed the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, the Illness Effects Questionnaire, the Treatment Effects Questionnaire, and the Beck Depression Inventory. Measures of ESRD severity/comorbidity and biochemistry were also collected. Results: Perceptions of treatment disruptiveness and attributions to poor medical care were significantly greater in CAPD. Home-based treatments were not found to confer an emotional adjustment advantage compared to hospital HD. There were marked differences across home-based modalities, with n=22 (44.4%) CAPD meeting the clinical cutoff of depression (?16) vs. n=6 (26.1%) in APD and n=2 (8%) in home HD. After adjusting for case-mix differences, the mean levels of depressed mood remained significantly higher in CAPD patients compared to APD and home HD (P<.01). On multiple regression analysis, 42.5% of the variance in depression was explained by the End-Stage Renal Severity Index, dialysis modality, perceived treatment disruptiveness, and beliefs about illness consequences and the extent to which the illness could be controlled. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the benefits of self-care are not uniformly manifested across dialysis modalities and that patients' cognitions are important determinants of depressed mood with implications for future research and clinical practice. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.008
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDepression
dc.subjectDialysis
dc.subjectHemodialysis
dc.subjectHospital
dc.subjectPeritoneal
dc.subjectSelf-care
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentPSYCHOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.04.008
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Psychosomatic Research
dc.description.volume69
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page363-370
dc.description.codenJPCRA
dc.identifier.isiut000282197300004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
checked on Apr 12, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

40
checked on Apr 12, 2021

Page view(s)

341
checked on Apr 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.