Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114084
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA recipe for success? A nutrient analysis of recipes promoted by supermarkets
dc.contributor.authorWademan, J.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, G.
dc.contributor.authorFinch, A.
dc.contributor.authorDhaliwal, S.S.
dc.contributor.authorScott, J.
dc.contributor.authorBegley, A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-10T03:01:20Z
dc.date.available2021-08-10T03:01:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationWademan, J., Myers, G., Finch, A., Dhaliwal, S.S., Scott, J., Begley, A. (2020). A recipe for success? A nutrient analysis of recipes promoted by supermarkets. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (11) : 1-12. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114084
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/196136
dc.description.abstractRecipe use impacts eating habits, yet there is limited research investigating the nutritional quality of recipes. Supermarket recipe magazines command large readerships, with over 4 million readers for each of the two major Australian supermarket publications. Assessing the nutrient content of featured recipes is therefore of public health interest. The nutrient content of 312 main-meal recipes from Coles® Magazine and Woolworths Fresh® were analyzed and compared against a traffic-light system for classifying nutrients of concern in chronic disease. Nutrient content was compared across recipe type (standard, advertorial and celebrity) and between recipes with and without health or nutrient claims. Overall compliance with the traffic-light criteria was low, with less than half of recipes meeting the target. Advertorial recipes had a higher energy (p = 0.001), saturated fat (p = 0.045) and sodium (p ? 0.001) content per serve, and per 100 g for sodium (p ? 0.001) compared to standard and celebrity recipes. Recipes with claims had greater compliance to the nutrient criteria (p < 0.001) compared to those without. These findings support previous research highlighting the poor nutritional quality of published recipes from a variety of sources. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceScopus OA2020
dc.subjectContent analysis
dc.subjectCooking
dc.subjectFood magazine
dc.subjectNutrient analysis
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectRecipe magazine
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.3390/ijerph17114084
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.description.volume17
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page1-12
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_ijerph17114084.pdf836 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons